<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for DavidDvorkin</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/DavidDvorkin/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/DavidDvorkin/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:11:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s How We Know Jesus Wasn&amp;#8217;t White</title><link>https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2020/07/28/heres-how-we-know-jesus-wasnt-white/#comment-5009790107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All the best gods are just like their believers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here&amp;#8217;s How We Know Jesus Wasn&amp;#8217;t White</title><link>https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2020/07/28/heres-how-we-know-jesus-wasnt-white/#comment-5009758152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:34:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Atheists Should &amp;#8220;STFU&amp;#8221; About Apollo 8&amp;#8217;s Bible Readings</title><link>https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2018/12/24/neil-degrasse-tyson-atheists-should-stfu-about-apollo-8s-bible-readings/#comment-4257405035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. And hi!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 15:02:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Atheists Should &amp;#8220;STFU&amp;#8221; About Apollo 8&amp;#8217;s Bible Readings</title><link>https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2018/12/24/neil-degrasse-tyson-atheists-should-stfu-about-apollo-8s-bible-readings/#comment-4255563919</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It infuriated me when the astronauts did that. I worked very hard on that mission, and the Bible reading was a slap in the face to me and all other non-believers who worked on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 19:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Turkish Therapist Says Atheists Who Learn to Breathe Properly Will Find God</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2017/12/19/turkish-therapist-says-atheists-who-learn-to-breathe-properly-will-find-god/#comment-3670184016</link><description>&lt;p&gt;She's suffering from binary thinking. How does she explain different varieties of theism, not to mention montheism versus polytheism? Maybe she's not breathing properly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:39:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Most Authors in the UK Make Less Than Minimum Wage</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/most-authors-in-the-uk-make-less-than-minimum-wage/126204#comment-2959219124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be more interested in knowing the median value. Far lower, I'm sure. The average is distorted by the numbers for people like J. K. Rowling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:59:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Price of Self-Publishing: INFOGRAPHIC</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-price-of-self-publishing-infographic/119733#comment-2654452163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those prices are excessive. The total cost should be under $2,000, if you shop around for competent, reasonable people. Moreover, if the writer is able to all of the work him/herself, then the cost is obviously $0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 16:50:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2582113082</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because I can see no  meaning in it. What is it that an ex-Jew should know better about? And why?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2581882861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a meaningless statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:02:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2581882325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably so. In reply to which, let me repost this link:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/"&gt;http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2581654178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately true. I fear we're a long way from the time when a self-identified atheist can run for high office and have a reasonable hope of being elected.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:53:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2581631087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems clear to me that he does not believe in God but lacks the political courage to say so.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for religious identity, it has no meaning without religious belief:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/"&gt;http://www.dvorkin.com/oajew/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:39:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bernie Sanders Is Proving You Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Be Religious to Be Successful in U.S. Politics</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/21/bernie-sanders-is-proving-you-dont-have-to-be-religious-to-be-successful-in-u-s-politics/#comment-2581614831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't agree. As an ex-Jew, I consider Sanders a coward. He lacks the courage to publicly and explicitly renounce religious identity along with belief in God. His response to an interviewer's question about his religious belief was rambling, circuitous, and typical poltician's evasiveness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Creationist Astronaut Just Went Up Into Space as Part of the Latest NASA Mission</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/19/a-creationist-astronaut-just-went-up-into-space-as-part-of-the-latest-nasa-mission/#comment-2581576279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I've heard that one before -- possibly back when I was an aerospace engineer at NASA, working on the Apollo missions.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Creationist Astronaut Just Went Up Into Space as Part of the Latest NASA Mission</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/19/a-creationist-astronaut-just-went-up-into-space-as-part-of-the-latest-nasa-mission/#comment-2578520402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:47:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Creationist Astronaut Just Went Up Into Space as Part of the Latest NASA Mission</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2016/03/19/a-creationist-astronaut-just-went-up-into-space-as-part-of-the-latest-nasa-mission/#comment-2578462647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;His degree is in engineering. That's one of the professions that's based on applying what has been discovered by others, not on questioning facts or learning how to determine them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Medicine is another, which is why Ben Carson's scientific ignorance is no surprise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 13:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Australians Are &amp;#8220;Offended&amp;#8221; by Member of Parliament&amp;#8217;s Black Jesus</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/12/23/some-australians-are-offended-by-member-of-parliaments-black-jesus/#comment-2423479624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm offended by the use of "laying" instead of "lying".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kroenke's KSE to buy KRWZ Radio (950 AM) from Entercom, format tba</title><link>http://www.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_29268702/kroenkes-kse-buy-krwz-radio-950-am-from#comment-2414677281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. This is really bad news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:31:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Denver Art Museum's sci-fi fantasy in clay</title><link>http://www.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_28200874/sci-fi-fantasy-clay-at-denver-art-museum#comment-2050048412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a shame that this interesting article is marred by the gratuitous insult in the opening paragraph. Rinaldi's knowledge of science fiction seems to be limited to sketchy viewing of a few big-budget movies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 13:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reza Aslan Scoffs That You Can Only Be a Credible Public Atheist If You&amp;#8217;re a Religious Scholar With a Degree</title><link>http://admin.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2014/10/12/reza-aslan-scoffs-that-you-can-only-be-a-credible-public-atheist-if-youre-a-religious-scholar-with-a-degree/#comment-1632026544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope that didn't show up twice. Recently, Disqus won't me let me post, or rather it seems not to be letting me post. So I give up and sign in with Facebook, instead. But I always wonder if both posts worked.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:31:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reza Aslan Scoffs That You Can Only Be a Credible Public Atheist If You&amp;#8217;re a Religious Scholar With a Degree</title><link>http://admin.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2014/10/12/reza-aslan-scoffs-that-you-can-only-be-a-credible-public-atheist-if-youre-a-religious-scholar-with-a-degree/#comment-1631931302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This line of attack has been around for a while. I parodied it years ago in a blog post:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://eyeblister.blogspot.com/2009/06/only-theologians-can-be-atheists.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://eyeblister.blogspot.com/2009/06/only-theologians-can-be-atheists.html"&gt;http://eyeblister.blogspot....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Lost My Sweetheart to Polyamory</title><link>http://www.alternet.org/comments/sex-amp-relationships/i-lost-my-sweetheart-polyamory-0#comment-1615705454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A writer who says "between she and I"? Ack.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Bezos’ Super-Secret Campfire Cooling?</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/is-bezos-super-secret-campfire-cooling/91698#comment-1601180500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Neil Armstrong? Wow! What secret science is Amazon up to now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From Amazon to burritos: 10 things you need to know about consumer drones</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/02/from-amazon-to-burritos-10-things-you-need-to-know-about-consumer-drones/#comment-1147551128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Drones too small to be visible are the future we should be discussing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dvorkin.com/dn/index.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dvorkin.com/dn/index.html"&gt;http://www.dvorkin.com/dn/i...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Safety Tip: Please Do Not Twerk Whilst Joined In Sexual Congress</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/25/safety-tip-please-do-not-twerk-whilst-joined-in-sexual-congress/#comment-1096932523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I doubt that they meant that other meaning, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidDvorkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:45:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>