<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for DOOW</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/DOOW/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/DOOW/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:47:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-472578113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sex and iq is your response? Who's the idiot?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16437196</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cazie:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before you continued with your evaluation of Social Security, let me give you a re-run of my ‘discussion’ with lindaclark(I edited the comment to fit here).  I’m unable to locate your other comment to me, but I suggest you read our entire ‘discussion’ before you conclude.   Essentially, I asked her to back up her assertion.  As for being abusive, I merely commented that when one fails to accept views that are different, one tends to sling mud, name calling, etc.  As far as calling me a liberal as though as it is an insult, thank you; I always tried to listen to views that are different than my own, but I will respond in kind when I considered appropriate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Medicare and Social Security has issues but it is far from failure; it performed as designed, that is, it is a safety net  for the retired and disabled.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now let me give you a little of history of Social Security.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The design of Social Security Retirement enacted by FDR back in 1935 was to supplement workers lost of income due to retirement.  The thing to pay attention was ‘supplement;’ it’s set to supplement 20% - 30% of a workers lost earning due to retirement.  Higher earners at the 20%+ range and 30% at the lower earner range.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Since your father was born in 1925 (age 84), his Social Security Retirement was grossly inflated due to the failure or unanticipated COLA increase during decades prior to his retirement.  During the Regan years you so loved, Congressman Pickle enacted legislation that ‘uncoupled’ the COLA for Social Security computations, hence, the “Pickle Amendment” delayed the fiscal issue for approximately thirty years and coming due 2005 – 2020 depending who you believed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In your father’s case, if he actually paid maximum Social Security Wages from 1951 to year of retirement, he probably received as high as 40%-45% of his retirement earnings.  This is because his benefits were calculated prior to the change in computation.  The system was not designed for such grossly inflated benefit resulting in financial deficit.   This is not to mention the 7 to 1 ratio then, versus 3 to 1 now.  ….&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16429715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously, a repeat is in order, however, I updated my comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three- &lt;br&gt;Here...&lt;br&gt;Worshipful&lt;br&gt;Ascended Master!&lt;br&gt;Make haste!&lt;br&gt;Appeal to the Dalai Lama Himself!&lt;br&gt;Do sacraments acceptable for purification!...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example four-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16429624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously, a repeat is in order, however, I updated my comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three- &lt;br&gt;Here...&lt;br&gt;Worshipful&lt;br&gt;Ascended Master!&lt;br&gt;Make haste!&lt;br&gt;Appeal to the Dalai Lama Himself!&lt;br&gt;Do sacraments acceptable for purification!...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example four-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:06:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16428243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16427941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Green Job"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is that all you got and that's your basis?   Pity-full, no wonder the Republicans have issues.  You definitely must be one, bottom of the barrel, but still one. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16427542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are what you are, be accountable and stick to the issue.&lt;br&gt; Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16427289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16427193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders,                                        almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16427046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, trying to diverge from the issues.  Let me stick to your prior comments and repeat again my response-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;         Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as ---Grandpa--You                                                                                                                                                                                                                      would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example three-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders, almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.  You need to accept your bigotry and recognize the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16416417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"THIS RECESSION WILL PASS! WE WILL RECOVER--WE ARE NOW VERY SLOWLY! WITHOUT THE STIMULUS PACKAGE ON OUR OWN WITHOUT OBAMA'S HELP---PROVING WE DO NOT NEED HIS HEALTHCARE BILL EITHER..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see we have an economist.  Why don’t you back up your assertion instead of pulling it out of your Butt?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:39:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16416339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16416322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:35:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16416272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me summarized your personal belief-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What was a crime yesterday is not a crime today, because today is not yesterday.&lt;br&gt;Condemn the group for the action of a few.&lt;br&gt;Yours is the only religion.&lt;br&gt;Different rules for different folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16413529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;indaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders, almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try to diverge from the issues again huh? Any attempt to discredit the teachings of Jesus…because of a few bad actors? Different rules for different folks? Hypocritical aren’t we?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your side is always on the high moral ground, right?&lt;br&gt;The other side is always evil, right?&lt;br&gt;Any side that is not your side is evil, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:11:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16413429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This deserves a re-run.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Never heard of religious intolerance have you?&lt;br&gt;Your side is always on the high moral ground, right?&lt;br&gt;The other side is always evil, right?&lt;br&gt;Any side that is not your side is evil, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16413181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't have the skill or the intelligence to side track the issue.  A re-run is in order here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders, almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try to diverge from the issues again huh?  Any attempt to discredit the teachings of Jesus…because of a few bad actors?  Different rules for different folks?  Hypocritical aren’t we?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Your side is always on the high moral ground, right?&lt;br&gt;The other side is always evil, right?&lt;br&gt;Any side that is not your side is evil, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me repeat-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I rest my case.&lt;br&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:50:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16413090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Pakistan waits for you...&lt;br&gt;they need your compassioniate attention over there...&lt;br&gt;Don't delay another day"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You lack the intelligence and maturity to recognize not to apply your set of rules to judge cultures different than your own.  Be accountable, accept you for what you are.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS:  The Pakistani people does need our compassion. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16413019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“ANY attemp to discredit the teachings of Jesus, because of the actions of the Crusaders, almost 1000 years ago, would be the equivalent of abandoning the Constitution of The United States of America for an anarchistic state because of a few bad actors who were elected in one failed administration...”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try to diverge from the issues again huh?  Any attempt to discredit the teachings of Jesus…because of a few bad actors?  Different rules for different folks?  Hypocritical aren’t we?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Your side is always on the high moral ground, right?&lt;br&gt;The other side is always evil, right?&lt;br&gt;Any side that is not your side is evil, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let me repeat-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I rest my case.&lt;br&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16412857</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You need to recognize your bigotry that is, the ignorance of judging others with your own yardstick.  Be accountable for your behavior.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16305859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;KORAN...&lt;br&gt;IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously forgot about the Crusades.  Is there is difference?&lt;br&gt;Never heard of religious intolerance have you?&lt;br&gt;Your side is always on the high moral ground, right?&lt;br&gt;The other side is always evil, right?&lt;br&gt;Any side that is not your side is evil, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you.  If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.”  You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades.  Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over.  You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16305764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's your point?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16305690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can destroy your cards, but you record will always be there.  Understand technology, it's here whether you accept it or not.  You have much more control of your records than your credit card.  You can deny access to your medical records but you can not with your credit record, not if you need its service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:01:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16298254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I already said I didn't "hate" them...those are your words...I absolute do not CHOOSE the Muslim faith as my owm...That is not hatred...it is not "bigotry" either..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are tiresome with your "bigotry" postings...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are tiresome with your mega over doing of&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;posting the same copied words over and over and over&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No one else on this blog is doing what you are doing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is noticeable DOOW&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be original please...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry.  You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you.  If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.”  You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades.  Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over.  You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own.  Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own.  You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste?  What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be original please?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is from one of my earlier postings, but it applies to your comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“I’m afraid this is the limits of what I can do. I could repeat but what you’re looking for understandings. That takes intelligence and emotional maturity, that is, the capacity to accept a view that’s different than yours. You lack both because of your limited mental ability and probably short a couple of marbles. That is something that I’m unable to provide.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note I'm not looking for agreement. This is just my humble opinion.&lt;br&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Health Care Policy |   Sound Off</title><link>http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/sound-off/#comment-16298199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lindaclark wrote, in response to DOOW:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I already said I didn't "hate" them...those are your words...I absolute do not CHOOSE the Muslim faith as my owm...That is not hatred...it is not "bigotry" either..”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Response:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here are samples of your past comments-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Example one-  “NEVER to "be" a Muslim&lt;br&gt;                          YOU need to BE educated and read the&lt;br&gt;                           KORAN...&lt;br&gt;                           IT SPEWS HATE”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Example two-  “So are you a Hindu?&lt;br&gt;                       Did you know that Hindus worship rats...?&lt;br&gt;                       Q. Do you care for rats in your house?&lt;br&gt;                      Because that rat just might be a deceased relative--such as                                ---Grandpa--You  would not want to starve Grandpa? Right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You obviously failed to comprehend, let me repeat- “Your condemnation of an individual or a group of individuals through no fault or control of their own is bigotry. You’re condemning the people of the Muslim faith for the action of a few, and that is the very definition of bigotry.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Religious tolerance appears to escape you. If you condemn ‘all Muslims for the act of a few, I say that is bigotry.” You alleged their religion is ‘evil’ then obviously you forgotten the Christian Crusades. Originality is not necessary, response to bigotry will always be the same, and it will be repeated over and over. You are the representative of that religious bigotry, and intolerance of any religion that disagree with your own. Let me repeat again another comment, you obviously believed you have the only key to the Kingdom, thus, your show of disdain for any view that is different than your own. You do not discuss, you yell, you name called and that blinds you to any view you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You disagree with the President because he didn’t pick a church fast enough for your taste? What are you? You sidestep the issues with religious hate and any thing else you can think of.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be original please?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is from one of my earlier postings, but it applies to your comments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“I’m afraid this is the limits of what I can do. I could repeat but what you’re looking for understandings. That takes intelligence and emotional maturity, that is, the capacity to accept a view that’s different than yours. You lack both because of your limited mental ability and probably short a couple of marbles. That is something that I’m unable to provide.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note I'm not looking for agreement. This is just my humble opinion.&lt;br&gt;End&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DOOW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>