<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for DLWormwood</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/DLWormwood/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/DLWormwood/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:59:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is A Burrito A Sandwich?</title><link>http://unbreaded.com/unbreaded/2009/01/16/is-a-burrito-a-sandwich/#comment-7325959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I remembered the case as Taco Bell, so it didn't occur for me to follow that link...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Why can't Disqus let me edit or remove my comments?)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLWormwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is A Burrito A Sandwich?</title><link>http://unbreaded.com/unbreaded/2009/01/16/is-a-burrito-a-sandwich/#comment-7324993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, found something in a strange place...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://flexibleparenting.com/2006/11/sandwich-vs-burrito.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flexibleparenting.com/2006/11/sandwich-vs-burrito.html"&gt;http://flexibleparenting.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLWormwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is A Burrito A Sandwich?</title><link>http://unbreaded.com/unbreaded/2009/01/16/is-a-burrito-a-sandwich/#comment-7324879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My Google Fu is failing me, but I remember reading about a legal ruling a couple years back regarding a lawsuit between Taco Bell and Panera regarding a mall occupancy exclusivity contract.  A Panera franchisee moved into a strip mall (read: no food court) with the agreement that no other "sandwich" shops be allowed to move in for a exclusivity period.  The mall realtor a few months later leased a spot to Taco Bell, and Panera sued.  The legal argument was that tacos and burrios were a kind of sandwich.  Due to the wording of the Panera agreement, the judge ruled against them and the Taco Bell was permitted to stay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do wonder what the wording of the lease agreement would be if Panera wanted the intended kind of first mover advantage again...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLWormwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:20:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Genius</title><link>http://camerondaigle.tumblr.com/post/86010120#comment-7176637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Lucas rationalized that duplicated speech of Han's in the Special Editions by making it looked like an excuse Han rehearsed before hand. I'm sure if you were a smuggler of valuable goods, and you had to throw it overboard, you'd be keenly aware that you'd have to say something to your employer at some point...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DLWormwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:43:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>