<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for CumpsD</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/CumpsD/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/CumpsD/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:23:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Taranis X9D Plus SE 2019 - OpenTX and EU-LBT/FCC Firmware
</title><link>https://fjp.at/projects/fpv/taranis#comment-5239083178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no eu option to uncheck. Apparently the X9D+ SE 2019 doesn't support D8 in the hardware anymore. Found it on the opentx github as an issue&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:23:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taranis X9D Plus SE 2019 - OpenTX and EU-LBT/FCC Firmware
</title><link>https://fjp.at/projects/fpv/taranis#comment-5238626962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have used the lua script and am in FCC mode. I flashed with flex9rm (there is no EU checkbox to uncheck) but I still dont have the option to select D8, only ACCESS D16. Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 06:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing a WebAPI in .NET Core with Integration tests</title><link>https://www.domstamand.com/testing-a-webapi-in-net-core-with-integration-tests/#comment-5073446536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't create an issue on your repository, but would like to ask for a feature. Right now this sets the claims with a hardcoded default issuer: &lt;a href="https://github.com/webmotions/fake-authentication-jwtbearer/blob/master/src/WebMotions.Fake.Authentication.JwtBearer/FakeJwtBearerClaimsHandler.cs#L67" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/webmotions/fake-authentication-jwtbearer/blob/master/src/WebMotions.Fake.Authentication.JwtBearer/FakeJwtBearerClaimsHandler.cs#L67"&gt;https://github.com/webmotio...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if you could support custom issuers. Because sometimes in an AuthorizationHandler people sometimes do:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;            var scopeClaims = context&lt;br&gt;                .User&lt;br&gt;                .FindAll(x =&amp;gt; x.Type == "permissions" &amp;amp;&amp;amp; x.Issuer == requirement.Issuer)&lt;br&gt;                .ToList();&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which would fail with the fake version, since it contains "LOCAL AUTHORITY" as issuer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:26:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Event Sourcing: Projections with Liquid Projections</title><link>https://codeopinion.com/event-sourcing-projections-with-liquid-projections/#comment-4775842231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to Eventstore support :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manipulating the Tool Windows - Help | JetBrains Rider</title><link>https://www.jetbrains.com/help/rider/Manipulating_the_Tool_Windows.html#comment-4727396172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:55:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manipulating the Tool Windows - Help | JetBrains Rider</title><link>https://www.jetbrains.com/help/rider/Manipulating_the_Tool_Windows.html#comment-4724575181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to re-assign the quick access numbers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: T-Mobile Open Source</title><link>http://opensource.t-mobile.com/blog/posts/introducing-tvault/#comment-3779104181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:25:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revisiting the PowerDNS "bind" back-end</title><link>http://jpmens.net/2015/04/02/revisiting-the-powerdns-bind-back-end/#comment-2598531393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this mean if you have a supermaster with MySQL backend and DNSSEC enabled, you could basically setup slaves with bind backend and have it all propagate?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:15:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damian Hickey
                </title><link>http://dhickey.ie/2014/11/our-open-source-policy-at-evision/#comment-1968844555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, added it, mailed you some other questions too :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:30:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Damian Hickey
                </title><link>http://dhickey.ie/2014/11/our-open-source-policy-at-evision/#comment-1968752524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doesn't that part make it tricky to just take that md file and use it for another company?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was just looking at re-using your document for my own, but not sure what to do with that clause&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tendencies of the Belgium software market</title><link>http://blog.timsommer.be/creating-a-software-architecture/#comment-1908635168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Infrabel uses StructureMap as default IoC, fyi, in case you want more data to your list :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:13:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Unconventional Review of React | Let’s Code JavaScript</title><link>http://www.letscodejavascript.com/v3/blog/2014/09/react_review#comment-1848690970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking very much forward to more of these reviews, at least they focus on what really matters when evaluating anything javascript library/framework&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Single Page Application Views Should be Hydrated on the Client, Not the Server</title><link>http://love2dev.com/#!Why-Single-Page-Application-Views-Should-be-Hydrated-on-the-Client-Not-the-Server#comment-1848668396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't we get rid of the hash bang style when we target newer browsers? Then the server gets the full url, and afterwards html 5 history api? (&lt;a href="http://caniuse.com/#feat=history)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://caniuse.com/#feat=history)"&gt;http://caniuse.com/#feat=hi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:35:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Single Page Application Views Should be Hydrated on the Client, Not the Server</title><link>http://love2dev.com/#!Why-Single-Page-Application-Views-Should-be-Hydrated-on-the-Client-Not-the-Server#comment-1848663494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, there sure are a lot of them &lt;a href="http://microjs.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://microjs.com/"&gt;http://microjs.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems I got a lot to look at, thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Single Page Application Views Should be Hydrated on the Client, Not the Server</title><link>http://love2dev.com/#!Why-Single-Page-Application-Views-Should-be-Hydrated-on-the-Client-Not-the-Server#comment-1847532145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is &lt;a href="http://movies.love2dev.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://movies.love2dev.com/"&gt;http://movies.love2dev.com/&lt;/a&gt; supposed to be a reference app implementing the practices you describe here? Or is there a github repo somewhere? Or is your book the reference to use? Asking from a point of view as a .NET developer who realizes Angular is not the way to go, but uncertain as to what is the way to go instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bewegingsmelder in je kleinste kamertje?</title><link>http://www.automality.eu/nl/blog/elektriciteit/2014/12/02/bewegingsmelder-in-kleinste-kamertje/#comment-1763002169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ik kan alvast melden dat de sensors van Basalte niet gevoelig genoeg zijn als je echt stil zit ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:01:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to host a Scalable and Optimized WordPress for Azure in minutes</title><link>https://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/15/how-to-host-a-scalable-and-optimized-wordpress-for-azure-in-minutes/#comment-1721561032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can I use my own hosted MySQL with this template or am I forced to use ClearDb?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 02:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Bower is better than NuGet - Tim Jones</title><link>http://simplyaprogrammer.com/2014/06/why-bower-is-better-than-nuget.html#comment-1594420742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fact that VS 2013 needs 32 NuGet packages for a default project scares the hell out of me, seems to promote bloat instead of thinking what you really need&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides that little venting on me side: I agree with everything you wrote on Bower being a better pkg manager than NuGet for everything client side&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Command Prompt is Ugly</title><link>http://bricelam.net/2014/08/14/command-prompt-is-ugly/#comment-1543070269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can also use cmder or some other prompt replacement&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1475989040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will do, I'll have a look at it further in the mean time, thanks for the chat :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 03:19:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1475979317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I got stuck at this in EntityFrameworkIQueryableQueryBase:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;public TQueryInterface Or(Func&amp;lt;tqueryinterface, tqueryinterface=""&amp;gt; firstPart, Func&amp;lt;tqueryinterface, tqueryinterface=""&amp;gt; secondPart)&lt;br&gt;        {&lt;br&gt;// TODO: Hmmm?&lt;br&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Ignore the ="" stuff this editor seems to add)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 03:05:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1475949862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, it reads a little less fluent, however, I'm not against it as a solution for Or. How would you implement that one?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 02:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1475943426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, double ctor because of that CreateNewQuery, it is there because you wrote about it in your post about immutability: &lt;a href="http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-immutability/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-immutability/"&gt;http://blog.fire-developmen...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll have a look at passing in a Set to see how it looks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, as I feared, Or's are very complicated, since you end up with a very hard way to define nested ors in a fluent syntax, Begin/EndOr is no option ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 02:10:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1475932528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was looking for everything wired up, using EF, right now I managed to throw something together which looks like this as an example, but the double ctor needed felt strange:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    public class QueryTrains : EntityFrameworkIQueryableQueryBase&amp;lt;train, querytrains,="" iquerytrains=""&amp;gt;, IQueryTrains&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    {&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        public QueryTrains(TrainsAppContext context)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;            : base(context.Trains)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        {&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        public QueryTrains(IQueryable&amp;lt;train&amp;gt; query)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;            : base(query)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        {&lt;br&gt;        }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        public IQueryTrains ByTo(string toStation)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        {&lt;br&gt;            return ExtendQuery(q =&amp;gt; q.Where(x =&amp;gt; x.To == toStation));&lt;br&gt;        }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        public IQueryTrains Delayed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        {&lt;br&gt;            get { return ExtendQuery(q =&amp;gt; q.Where(x =&amp;gt; x.IsDelayed)); }&lt;br&gt;        }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;        protected override IQueryTrains CreateNewQuery(IQueryable&amp;lt;train&amp;gt; newQuery)&lt;br&gt;        {&lt;br&gt;            return new QueryTrains(newQuery);&lt;br&gt;        }&lt;br&gt;    }&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another thing I was wondering with the FluentRepo, you have .And as a keyword, which is nice since you keep on extending your internal Queryable, but how do you deal with something like .Or?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 01:52:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Fluent Repository: Implementing It for EF</title><link>http://blog.fire-development.com/2013/06/25/a-fluent-repository-implementing-it-for-ef/#comment-1465397179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering if you perhaps have a GitHub repo where your entire series comes together?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Cumps</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>