<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Crunchinator</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Crunchinator/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Crunchinator/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:40:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1215549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"but in all those examples you have a choice [...]"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Way to miss the point. Additionally, in all these examples you already made a choice and once that choice was made discovered faults that were out of your control. Furthermore, a choice that best fits your needs might not exist. For example, I do not like any of the DVD ripping utilities that I've tried on Linux. Yes, they exist, yes I can use them but I simply do not like them. This is a case of picking the one I hate the least.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"you can correct the programs problems and redistribute it [...]"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, I could do all that just like you, not being satisfied with your airline experience, could launch your own airline and design and build your own jets. It's in the realm of possibility but far from an optimal solution and a very unrealistic expectation. Your expectation for me to invest quite a bit of time and money (all decisions are economic) into implementing my own solution is asinine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1155633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So if your car breaks down it isn't a problem because my car still works? If you buy a motherboard that used faulty capacitors it's not a problem if they blow out because I--using the same mother board--have working capacitors in mine? There was nothing wrong with the first release PS2s because mine kept working despite the numerous other people having faulty lasers in theirs? Those idiots were surely doing something wrong since mine works.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In short, working for you doesn't equate to not being faulty by design and therefore is irrelevant to his problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Post Script&lt;br&gt;Giving back to the community doesn't mean they give back to you; sometimes they tell you to fuck off in one way or another.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:56:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1147086</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, don't you feel a little hypocritical when you essentially call people idiots even though you are using projected numbers in an attempt to debunk claims using real numbers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1141631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No shit, if it was a problem they wouldn't be "long-time KDE user[s]". You might as well have stated that it isn't a problem for people who don't think it's a problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:25:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1141570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Projecting 5 million units sold is not the same as actually selling 5 million units.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:17:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1141493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...So you're not a competent admin?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1136484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All you need to do to keep XP running well is to defrag often, run disk cleanup or CCleaner often (all of which can be automated) and not be a complete retard when it comes to installing / uninstalling applications--in example, installing applications using the desktop folder as the destination.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1136430</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We'll settle this, you need only be in a location that lacks DSL or Cable offerings which, contrary to what some people believe there are still many areas where dial-up or satellite are your only options. I have cable but if I drive twenty miles from my house in any direction then dial-up is the only option. People who live in small towns or a little ways outside of town may not have broadband services.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1136302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So you're essentially asking "apart from all the shit that doesn't work and the cluster-fuck user interface, what's wrong with KDE"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:24:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1136241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I seriously don't get this "freedom" thing in Linux. What "freedoms" do you gain? The "freedom" to spend years learning a programming language, then taking the time to learn about a particular piece of software, then modify it for your own use? The "freedom" to choose between various shitty components in your OS--which to some extent can be done in Windows as there are replacements for Explorer, CMD, Regedt, and a few other things? I use Linux and I'm no more "free" on Linux than I am on Windows. Actually, given the abysmal support for anything proprietary in Linux I'd argue that it's more fascist than anything else. So what if I have the source? Big deal, I program and I still have no interest in dicking around with these open source projects.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least you don't have to pay for Linux? So what? I spent $40 on Windows XP Pro and $20 on Microsoft Office Pro 2003 via a HUP / EPP. My college gives all CSCI students a copy of Windows Vista Business for free. Everything else on my computer was legally obtained at no cost (freeware). $60 dollars spent nearly six years ago is ass-wiping money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1131529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PowerShell 2.0 looks pretty good. But you know what my favorite part about PowerShell is? Passing the output of commands as objects rather than text which makes piping commands together so much easier as you don't have to worry about format. Linux, get on the ball and copy this feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:13:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1131402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If by "using their computers" you actually mean "dicking around with their distro and breaking shit left and right" then I guess that'd be somewhat accurate. Although in my experience most Windows boxes are working, maybe not optimally, but they are working and half the users I see continue working even if there is some problem with their box to which they are usually oblivious to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1131380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I meant to say "30 Minutes download time isn't that unrealistic"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1126243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You do realize there are some very large updates for Ubuntu and a on a frequent basis as well. 30 Minutes download time isn't that realistic. Your DL speeds are the not the norm for everyone else. It's also not that uncommon for people to take a long time to setup Linux distros... but I guess all those "Help [something] doesn't work!" posts on numerous Linux forums just don't exist. Probably Microsoft employees, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenged</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/yay.html#comment-1126083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Learn to read because he said it takes ten hours to fix all the broken crap after the install.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants and Laughs</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/rants-and-laughs.html#comment-1114010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought Linux users were supposed to be smart. If they want to fix the slow performance in Vista why not turn off unneeded services and applications? It's easier than messing with Xorg.conf. Bunch of hypocrites. It's cool to mess with esoteric config files in Linux but not a .msc in Windows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:36:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants and Laughs</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/rants-and-laughs.html#comment-1113933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Big fucking deal. Guess how many people really even need to know about the kernel to include application developers? And guess what, I used Windows and I knew about the kernel. If you need to know about the kernel then you will learn about it, you will encounter it. If you go your whole life not knowing what it is then you obviously didn't need to know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants and Laughs</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/rants-and-laughs.html#comment-1113701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the five things you can't teach Ubuntu article I love how some idiot attempts to disprove that you cannot copy and paste or drag and drop pictures from Firefox into Impress by listing a five step process involving clicking various buttons. Awesome! Way to prove that guy wrong!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1088885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Flash is proprietary evil! No more secret sauce!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:43:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1088546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does "just work" you just have to rewrite the OS from scratch. It's really a trivial matter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1088129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How does FOSS address the issue of creating software that requires input from people who aren't developers, such as Tax preparation software? You'd need to have people devote time to keeping up with the latest tax laws and who would bear the legal responsibility for a software bug that lead to incorrect tax claims?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1074348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's get together sometime.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1074047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My penis has more users than Linux does. My customer satisfaction rate is one-hundred percent. Want a customer review? Ask your girlfriend--a lovely cum dumpster I might add.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1073398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm inside your girlfriend and she loves it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1068734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The internets are full of lies and commies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Crunchinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:49:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>