<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Ciaoenrico</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Ciaoenrico/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Ciaoenrico/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 11:28:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Voice Search Could Change The Future Of SEO « SEOPressor – WordPress SEO Plugin</title><link>http://seopressor.com/blog/how-voice-search-could-change-the-future-of-seo/#comment-2692925109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All great points. I have to wonder if/how keyword research will change for voice search. After all, slang changes as fast as the next high school graduation class. We may eventually need something like a SlangWordTracker to figure out how the majority of people are speaking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, if we COULD determine that, creating persona funnels would be a lot easier! Just make one particular flavor of slang send that user down their own path to a conversion!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 11:28:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Honey, I Shrunk the Autobahn: Rick Moranis sings Kraftwerk | Dangerous Minds</title><link>http://dangerousminds.net/comments/honey_i_shrunk_the_autobahn_rick_moranis_sings_kraftwerk#comment-2170199083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a digital copy of this album - I would share it, but I think that's still illegal. Sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2015 06:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Twitter&amp;#8217;s new analytics could turn us all into stat-hungry engagement addicts</title><link>http://thenextweb.com/twitter/2014/07/12/twitters-new-analytics-turn-us-stat-hungry-engagement-addicts/#comment-1486898981</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If analytics keep someone else from tweeting crap, frankly, I'm all for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After all, is the humanity of a tweet really corrupted when someone learns over time that the people following them like one kind of tweet and not another? If so, does that mean one's tweets were done an injustice when they learned no one wants to see their pictures of their lunch every day either? In both cases, something outside their heads told them what they needed to do to be better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the real mistake will come in the form of people bragging about their engagement stats. If twits across the land start sharing, "I just had an engagement day of 15%!" then this analytics stuff really will need to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Maximize Your LinkedIn Endorsements</title><link>http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/manage-linkedin-endorsements/#comment-1264615621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article. I have to wonder though - since it is so easy to give someone a recommendation on LinkedIn, (you can even do them in bulk,) do these recommendations really mean anything?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It feels like a throwback to the &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; days, when if you got enough people to tag your page with the keyword you wanted, the assumption was your page must really have a lot to do with that keyword. Until people figured out how easy it was to game a tag.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Twitter Changes Making Life Easier for Big Brands</title><link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-tools/2-twitter-changes-making-life-easier-for-big-brands/#comment-1102408211</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had no idea how in the minority I was on this - but I have found Direct Messages to be wholly useless, and for a long time. The only time I get DM'd is when someone wants me to follow their Facebook page too, or I get the automated "Thank you for following me!" message so many people think is a good idea. As a result I never read them. I regularly use various DM inbox cleaners to flush all these messages out - and these are from people I AM following!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So this new ability to receive DMs from anyone seems like a march in the wrong direction, at least to me. I had hoped Twitter would allow me to limit who can DM me to, say, a specific list of actual friends I create. Unfortunately, if Twitter thinks my problem up until now is I haven't been able to get enough unsolicited messages from strangers, limiting DMs is way off their radar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:44:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Four Things Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Needs to Improve (Part One)</title><link>http://www.tvovermind.com/agents-of-shield/four-things-marvels-agents-s-h-e-l-d-needs-improve-part-one-223108#comment-1101501216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My big problem remains this show's deification of state power. "Captain America: Winter Soldier" looks like it's going to address this, so I hope it finds its way into "Agents of SHIELD."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Rules for a Video to Go Viral</title><link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/content-marketing/4-rules-for-a-video-to-go-viral/#comment-1075387071</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I would like to know is, exactly when IS something considered, "viral?" Technically, anything that gets shared one time is viral, but of course we're setting our sights a lot higher than that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what is that line? Because just saying, "well, you know - when it's popular and stuff!" is the weakest online metric since, "page hits."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:49:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Ways This Big Brand Blew It on Twitter</title><link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-tools/4-ways-this-big-brand-blew-it-on-twitter/#comment-1061935477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it depends on the nature of that room everyone's standing around in. If it's a casual BBQ, jumping in and saying, "Well then you're in luck! I happen to sell that thing you weren't talking to me about!" it could be rude. If it's a networking lunch where you know people are pitching business at each other anyway, it's probably fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My point is, IMHO, one needs to determine how the audience looks at that room. Sure, a lot of people promote stuff on Twitter, so maybe they should be ready to hear pitches. But if they didn't  come to Twitter to be pitched at, they might not be that responsive to a hard sell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Ways This Big Brand Blew It on Twitter</title><link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-tools/4-ways-this-big-brand-blew-it-on-twitter/#comment-1055377385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow - you stay classy, T-Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this does constitute a major goof, but a qualified one. People are now hip to how badly a company can use Twitter. (Like Urban Outfitters offering free shipping for Hurricane Sandy with the hashtag, #All Soggy. Yikes.) By comparison, this seems innocuous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem is if an organization is thoughtlessly tacky in public, people will see the brand as out of touch. Instead of being the silly Hail Mary campaign to possibly get a couple of people to switch carriers, it damaged their reputation with everyone who saw it and rolled their eyes. T-Mobile got on the social medias all the kids are using nowadays and individually spammed them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you can't say something without properly thinking out how the message will be received, don't say anything at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:10:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Iron Man 3 Cast Talks Terrorism and the Future of the Franchise</title><link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/05/iron-man-3-terrorism/#comment-882817045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don Cheadle is in this twice? Man! That's a lot of Don Cheadle!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:51:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google adds a new Settings app to Android devices</title><link>https://betanews.com/2013/02/27/google-adds-a-new-settings-app-to-android-devices/#comment-814370725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the point of turning automatic check-ins on or off: Not exactly. While I admit it might just be my device, everytime I uncheck this option, after I save this setting, back out and come back in, it's checked again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RIM stock jumps thanks to reported Samsung deal</title><link>https://www.slashgear.com/rim-stock-jumps-thanks-to-reported-samsung-deal-08242250/#comment-613899325</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What would REALLY be interesting is if Microsoft OEMs got so bent about the Surface tablet, they turned to BB10 for their tablets instead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unlikely? Maybe - but come on, it would be sweet to see RIM come back by eating Microsoft's lunch!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:14:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virgin Mobile&amp;#8217;s iPhone 4S sums add up</title><link>https://www.slashgear.com/virgin-mobiles-iphone-4s-sums-add-up-08232914/#comment-596860321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The one major drawback of the contract-free iPhone is that you're still bound to Virgin Mobile whether there's a contract involved or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's say you have a VM iPhone, and one day you decide you want to walk away from them. Fine, you won't have to pay any exit fee, but you will have a $650 paperweight that is useless unless and until you return to Virgin Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're still tied to a carrier - it's just a different kind of rope.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Social Media Marketers, SEO Is Much More Popular Than PPC</title><link>http://searchengineland.com/for-social-media-marketers-seo-is-much-more-popular-than-ppc-117274#comment-484993137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This might also be true because so many social media marketers used to be full-time SEOs. I remember looking at &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; as a possible source of inbound links before deciding they were crap for that - but the potential for directly reaching consumers was there. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Paid search, on the other hand, is like asking 100 women off the street to have sex with you: You get slapped 99 times, but that 100th one... It's not exactly the kind of mind frame you need for SMM.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Pet Peeve – Drive-by Venue Mayors</title><link>http://dwaynekilbourne.com/2012/01/11/social-media-pet-peeve-drive-by-venue-mayors/#comment-411411846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, thanks for the link! ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Groupon demand almost finishes cupcake-maker</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8904653/Groupon-demand-almost-finishes-cupcake-maker.html#comment-370348198</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fair enough - I've never heard "custom" used like that before, as it really looked like she was hoping for more "customers." If that's correct, so be it - there are two errors that need to be looked at. If this were just someone's dopey blog, I wouldn't have bothered. It isn't, though, so I thought the author might want to know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And like everyone else, no, I have nothing else better to do. Thank all of you for taking time out of your busy schedules to reply back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Groupon demand almost finishes cupcake-maker</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/8904653/Groupon-demand-almost-finishes-cupcake-maker.html#comment-370234656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are a couple of spelling errors in this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“It's been an absolutely nightmare,” she said. (should be "absolute," unless this is what she actually said.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;" hope to gain new custom out of the deal" (should be "customers.")&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"to inform potential customers that the deal in no longer available." (should be "the deal IS no longer available.")&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Plus Traffic Drops, 1269% Gains Erased</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_plus_traffic_drops_1269_gains_erased.php#comment-332753315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly - and temporary. I guarantee you that Bieber kid's going to end up on whatever incarnation of "Celebrity Rehab" is on the air in 15 years. That'll be about the time teenagers ask their parents, "Twi-what?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the meantime, I think G+ will continue its slow build.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Plus Traffic Drops, 1269% Gains Erased</title><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_plus_traffic_drops_1269_gains_erased.php#comment-331294687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But I think we all knew that massive bump in traffic at the beginning was temporary. Nothing gets that level of activity and sustains it, certainly not something that isn't even finished yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+ Fixes the Stream Jumping Problem</title><link>http://plusheadlines.com/google-fixes-the-stream-jumping-problem/2108/#comment-313515539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That really is a smart solution!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Conde Nast Spins Out Reddit, Without Letting Go</title><link>http://allthingsd.com/20110906/conde-nast-spins-out-reddit-without-letting-go/#comment-303817134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's telling that Reddit isn't one of the options available to republish this post. Sure, it shows up in the blanket "Share" link - but next to garbage like Plaxo and Orkut for God's sake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google+ invite received, we go hands-on</title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/28/dnp-invite-received-we-go-hands-on-with-google/#comment-239127255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been trying to send people invites for hours now. Still no dice getting them out. (Sorry.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:45:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DM Whacker</title><link>http://twitdom.com/dm-whacker/#comment-213619280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You'll need to switch to the OLD layout of Twitter for this to work properly apparently, but once you do it works fantastically. (And fast - I had sent DMs going back a couple of years, and it cleaned everything in less than a minute.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 21:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Social Media Lessons From Phil Collins</title><link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-strategy/7-socia-media-lessons-from-phil-collins/#comment-166839916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points all - if followed correctly, I bet anyone can be like Phil Collins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh, wait... ew...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:30:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adult Swim Video : Tim and Eric Awesome Show Great Job! : "Living" with Dr. Steve Brule.</title><link>http://video.adultswim.com/tim-and-eric-awesome-show-great-job/living-with-dr-steve-brule.html#comment-166671938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was going to share this on my Twitter and Facebook profiles, thereby delivering more traffic to this video and possibly others on your site, but... nah, I don't want people I actually like to be forced to sit through the big dumb asshole-ish ads that play first.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaoenrico</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:38:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>