<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ChrisWexler</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/ChrisWexler/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/ChrisWexler/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:25:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Keys to the White House</title><link>http://www.courtneyperigo.com/single-post/2016/12/26/The-Keys-to-the-White-House#comment-3494603185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dr. Lichtman was a professor of mine back in the day -- and didn't much like the computer -- I love that he may have accidentially stumbled into a machine learning concept!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWexler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Bowl 50: What $5 million can buy you in digital media</title><link>http://digiday.com/?p=159377#comment-2495895721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like you noted at the top -- none of these put your brand at the center of cultural conversation for several weeks if executed properly -- even though to do that you need to spend more time and treasure than $5MM typically...  You miss reach, quality cues, broad cultural relevance, brand fame, a true PR platform for brands that are typically invisible...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the death of mass culture - I'm not surprised that advertisers spend more each year for SB spots -- I think they increase in value every year as culture sub-segments more everyday.  For mass appeal brands, it is literally a gold mine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWexler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 11:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How NOT to calculate ad revenue</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/04/01/how-not-to-calculate-ad-revenue/#comment-1843641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At what point is remnant inventory counter productive -- particularly in the video space?  Selling inventory for pennies on the dollar brings in revenue, to be sure, but theoretically it also brings in tier 2 and 3 advertisers which can severely degrade the user experience on the site.  Is 5% of your revenues worth making 50% of your site less desirable to your core users? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wouldn't just be better to forgo that revenue in order to enhance the experience and encourage repeat visits or even use that space for house ads promoting new areas of the site as you build your premium advertiser base?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All revenue is not worth it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWexler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook viral marketing: When and why do apps &amp;#8220;jump the shark?&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2008/03/05/facebook-viral-marketing-when-and-why-do-apps-jump-the-shark/#comment-1843603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.  Seems to me that this just shows why you need to always be in beta or working on the next version...  There are few long-term home-runs in this business - and all you are really doing with great products is lengthening the shark tail, not eliminating it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems to me that a possible strategy with this reality is using your initial product to popularize the second and so on...  Overlapping shark-tails means when you jump the shark, the users have somewhere to land.  Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWexler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:35:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 ways to break past the San Francisco echo-chamber</title><link>http://andrewchen.co/2007/12/21/5-ways-to-break-past-the-san-francisco-echo-chamber/#comment-1843448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant post -- I think the most undervalued quality in interactive is empathy.  Understanding what people with a different perspective then your own (tech-savy, early adopter) is vital.  Every GREAT tech idea has to scale to the average citizen.  I wish I had books to recommend, but we also have to think beyond the U.S. -- its a global market now...  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisWexler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>