<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of Carl_Barron</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Carl_Barron/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Carl_Barron/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:02:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pelosi: &amp;#039;Congress Has Always Been A Mockery&amp;#039;</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/531374',%20486571309L)#comment-486571309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I ever find an actual democracy somewhere, I will be its cheerleader. The one we Americans are accused of being is the biggest fraud to come to our American shores from Europe. Nancy Pelosi is one of those presently sitting high at the top of that fraud. The Democrats, most generous in accusations, do the their accusing job on someone, then immediately insist their victim be civil. She now accuses the U.S. Congress of being a life long "mockery". I think she should be thrown out of our Congress by our Congress, with civility of course, the next time she dares go there,    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 21:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pelosi: &amp;#039;Congress Has Always Been A Mockery&amp;#039;</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/531374',%20486582435L)#comment-486582435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It isn't our congress that is wrong. It is the people we keep electing and reelecting that is the problem. A Constitutional congress would not be a perpetual battle between two political parties. It would be the results of honest citizens of this Republic representing the people who elected them. I know that isn't what we have. What we have is a Marxist party calling themselves democrats, and a republican party trying to return to constitutional government. You, unfortunately, used the usual democrat defense for their usual unpopular actions; eveybody else does it like that so why are you accusing us?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pelosi: &amp;#039;Congress Has Always Been A Mockery&amp;#039;</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/531374',%20486591991L)#comment-486591991</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is an old Greek story about a slave girl who saved a very bad king from being poisoned. The king ask her why? She replied that the people had a good king, but someone killed him. The one who killed him became a king and he was worse than the good king. she told the third king that he had killed the bad king and become a much worse king, in the bad king's place. She said, "If I let them kill you what kind of king will we have next?" Hanging may be too good for some of our congressmen but if they are all hanged before they are replaced by a wiser vote, It may kill our beautiful Republic. The present White house staff have a totally uneacceptable even for a king's valet, or is that varlet, I don't know?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:30:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Administration Applauds Tax Cuts—In People’s Republic of China</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/531981',%20489425278L)#comment-489425278</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Obamanites are always ready to cheer fellow Marxists. China is holding, reportedly, $2 trillion in Euro bonds and $1.7 trillion in American bonds. The chinese are cheering the American and European socialist nearly 4 trillion times more efficiently than the Chinese are being cheered. The American and European socialist's hatred of everything economically useflul sold our factories out. Now they are cheering the chinese for making and keeping the American profits gauranteed to China when our American socialists made certain our American worker's salaries went elswhere. We old guys remember when made in America was on nearly every item people needed in our Republic. Thanks to the American Marxists (our democracy) it is difficult to buy a common manufactured item made in America. The most common idenifier I see is "made in China."     &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Administration Applauds Tax Cuts—In People’s Republic of China</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/531981',%20489436856L)#comment-489436856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the Democrats, of whatever of their many vaieties of Republic accusers, have consistently put their Party politics above the national good. President Andrew Jackson, after he left office, said about the democrats who he saw doing a dirty deed, said that he hoped the people would send those who put politics above the national good back to their dung heaps to live forever.&lt;br&gt;I liked Andrew Jackson better after I read that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WH: &amp;#039;Gimmick&amp;#039; To Suggest Obama, Buffett Voluntarily Pay More Taxes</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/533316',%20494722172L)#comment-494722172</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The amazing lack of personal redistribution of wealth on the part of the "committed socialists" who are hawking the redistribution of wealth for what is centainly going to be anyone who already pays taxes, and can't afford the usual untouchable loopholes used by the rich, is unbelievable. You can't find a rich "socialists" has dipped down into his own pocket and shared the poverty of the poor , or even the middle money of the middle class.  Socialists posture and preen publicly, proving their socialism to the adoring acceptors of the disinformation that they are willing to share their own "personal redistribution" of wealth. It aint going to happen kids. socialism is about taking power and money from other people, not curing poverty by redistributing  socialist wealth. &lt;br&gt;Good luck to all!&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NationalJournal.com - Access Denied</title><link>(u'http://www.nationaljournal.com/member/nationalsecurity/insiders-u-s-should-hold-off-on-cutting-aid-to-egypt-arming-syrian-rebels-20120224',%20494838582L)#comment-494838582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The United States should withhold its support for egypt until after it is shre the Muslim Brotherhood is not in, or gaining control of Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood has a plan to conquer the United States. I have read that plan. The Muslim Brotherhood recently stated its purpose to bring about the destruction of Isreal. New tyrants are not supportable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IS THIS TRUE? WOMEN AT THE WHITE HOUSE MAKE LESS THAN THE MEN?</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/11/is-this-true-women-at-the-white-house-make-less-than-the-men/',%20495037330L)#comment-495037330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The good news I have heard about the GSA scandal seems to be missing the major problem with that action. The GSA people seem to be guilty of what they are accused but they are not being accused of "the misappropriation of government funds." The last time I checked, that was a felony. I don't expect the Holder Justice Department to be able to find anything that tricky; but, Fox News has not mentioned it. &lt;br&gt;Good luck to all&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:17:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reps. Denham &amp;#038; Mica: Cover-Up of Lavish Las Vegas Conference Went to Top Levels of GSA</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/13/reps-denham-mica-cover-up-of-lavish-las-vegas-conference-went-to-top-levels-of-gsa/',%20496717334L)#comment-496717334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Th GSA scandal is the most blatantly arrogant display of disregard by government employees for their personal responsibility to the american people and our Republic. The probable misappropriation of government funds to accomplish that fun scandal, I hope, will warn the American people that others in other positions may be following their example. Or, Perhaps, the GSA people were following the example of others in government. Mybe and investigation will show who is following whom!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reps. Denham &amp;#038; Mica: Cover-Up of Lavish Las Vegas Conference Went to Top Levels of GSA</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/13/reps-denham-mica-cover-up-of-lavish-las-vegas-conference-went-to-top-levels-of-gsa/',%20496722925L)#comment-496722925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The definition of our Republic is our constitution; all other definitions are wrong or incomplete. The biggest scandal assaulting our government is that we allow our Republic to be called "our democracy." The "our democracy" definition is not just wrong, it is rediculous. Most of our government scandals, GSA, or any other, ultimately hides behind the, "our democracy" definition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Day 44: Still No Human Rights Reports from State Department -- But Clinton Warns N. Korea Against Missile Launch</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/534137',%20496739231L)#comment-496739231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Democrats/socialists/progressives/etc. have had no budget for three years. The law requires them to have a budget. A budget in all probablility would show the Obamanites unwilling or incapable of following a budget. Is there a government agency of our Republic that hasn't witnessed this lack of a penalty for Democrats who disobey the laws of our Republic, Like the State, GSA/etc. Get real! Why should our totally left wing but still big tent "democracy" obey our laws. It isn't those who obey laws who have power; It is those who ignore laws who have power.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:01:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG!</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/open-thread/blog-123/',%20498548531L)#comment-498548531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To answer, America isn't delving into almost absolute government control. The socialists controlling the Democratic Party in the U.S. are not delving, and it isn't almost. The Democrats/socialists are attempting total control of the American people by using government to effect that control. The American people, the citizens of our Republic, are waking up to that problem and are reacting more favorably every day and giving their support to American constitutional freedms, which requires removing the socialists from office.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BLOG!</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/open-thread/blog-123/',%20498551257L)#comment-498551257</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The definition of our Republic is our constitution, all other definitions are wrong or incomplete. defining our Republic as "our democracy" is one of the worst of the wrong definitions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:47:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Because of Obamacare 26-Year-old Law Student Doesn’t Have to Work at ‘Big Firm,’  Sebelius Tells Sharpton Audience</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/534438',%20499432712L)#comment-499432712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It isn't those who own money who have power; it is those who control money who have power! Obamacare will leach every ounce of private money into governent control and Sebillius must surely know that. Lawyers devoting their lives to "social justice" sounds so, well, so, democratic and socially useful. Except to all of us who know the code. We know "social justice" is the code for the redistribution of wealth. we also know that "Obamacare" is the code for "it is those who control money who have power." I believe the "Obama democracy" wants all of the power that comes with all of the money. If Obama becomes the one percent, will he redistribute the "social justice" money to the 99%?&lt;br&gt; In the coming election, I suggest every patriotic American who loves his country vote. I don't believe you will like the fundamental changes to our Republic if you don't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Reaching Out to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood</title><link>(u'http://www.cnsnews.com/node/99501',%20499454537L)#comment-499454537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;isn't it nice of Hilary to be speaking out on Muslim womens rights from Hhungary. I wish she had spoken more about the Muslim document the rights are written in. the document the Muslims could use to inforce those rights. I wonder if there is a code word she could use for women's rights. social justice would work, but it is being used for some stuff about money by the Obamanities. Oh, well! They will come up with something, I'm sure.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congressional Pig Book for 2012 Released &amp;#8212; What Does It Reveal?</title><link>(u'http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/17/congressional-pig-book-for-2012-released-what-does-it-reveal/',%20500227761L)#comment-500227761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We don't need one more bureaucracy to ride herd on the Senate. We need the entire voting population of this "dissatisfied with the Senate" nation voting against those we are dissatisfied with. There is always a Democrat willing and ready to hire more bureaucrats to fool the voters into thinking a Democratic Party committe can replace the voters and do the job voters should be doing. &lt;br&gt;I have a better idea! Teach the Senators the meaning of this one simple sentence, "The definition of our Republic is its Constitution, all other definitions are wrong or incomplete."&lt;br&gt;That might help the Senators to actually discover that our Republic should be called "Our Republic" not "our democracy. 'Our democracy" is one of those fefinitions for our Republic that is totally wrong. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:15:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congressional Pig Book for 2012 Released &amp;#8212; What Does It Reveal?</title><link>(u'http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/17/congressional-pig-book-for-2012-released-what-does-it-reveal/',%20500237672L)#comment-500237672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. Sooner 58. I like your conservative spirit, but I think term limits will not sove the problem. I have nothing against them except this. The voters should be in control of those in Congress and how long they remain there. Term limits keep the American voters out of that mix. If two terms are the limit, every congressman would be lame duck all of his second term and owe nothing to those who voted him in office. I believe that might be called the congressman's feather your own nest term in office.&lt;br&gt;THE DEFINITION OF OUR REPUBLIC IS ITS CONSTITUTION; ALL OTHER DEFINITIONS ARE WRONG OR INCOMPLETE.&lt;br&gt;Good luck and God speed to you and the OK State. Stay strong.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judge Napolitano Reacts to GSA Admin. Jeff Neely Pleading the 5th, Says Conspiracy Charges Could Be in the Cards</title><link>(u'http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/16/judge-napolitano-reacts-to-gsa-admin-jeff-neely-pleading-the-5th-says-conspiracy-charges-could-be-in-the-cards/',%20500258253L)#comment-500258253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;George, what kind of mess have you gotten Obama into this time? Did those GSA Big Spenders From the North misappropriate government funds? Why didn't they spend the money in Texas instead of Sen. Harry Ried's home state?&lt;br&gt;If Obama is reelected, he will be in a even bigger mess. He will inherit himself and his own inept administration. What could be worse? I have no idea what he will do then. Maybe he should resign now to protect his future from himself. I will help a little with this simple definition.&lt;br&gt;The definition of our Republic is its Constitution; all other definitions are wrong or incomplete!   Defining "our Republic" as our democracy is wrong.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:56:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: U.S. General: ‘More Troops’ Needed to Secure the Southwest Border</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/535639',%20500387810L)#comment-500387810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Our Southern border is under a very serious attack  by criminal drug cartels. Simple police action has not stopped this attack and, indeed, the drug cartels have been able to secure themselves in locations north of that border in Arizona. There have been many drug related deaths in AZ that would not have occurred if the borders had been closed to drug traffic. The government of Arizona has previously requested border protection from the Federal goverenment, as per Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution of our Republic. The Federal reply has been inadequate to the conditons on the ground at our border and, I believe, inadequate to the ability of the Federal government to provide border protection. I wonder that the Arizona State government has not brought legal action against the Federal government for its lack of responsibility for border protection. How bad do things need to be before The Federal Government acts because it is required to do so by constitutional law. Is AZ a part of the socialists open border policy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The definintion of our Republic is its Constitution; all other definitions are wrong or incomplete!&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GSA Scandal Continues to Grow; Emails Expose Jeff Neely Bragging About Traveling on the Taxpayers’ Dime</title><link>(u'http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/17/gsa-scandal-continues-to-grow-emails-expose-jeff-neely-bragging-about-traveling-on-the-taxpayers-dime/',%20501201768L)#comment-501201768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the GSA thought they could get away with free trips and free, whatever, I think it is time we know who else in our government believes , free is what you can get if you try, and no one can be arrested for trying. Whereever there are no laws, you can count on finding outlaws.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Krauthammer Predicts Obama’s 2012 Campaign Will Be ‘The Dirtiest In History’; Chris Hahn and Chris Plante Weigh In</title><link>(u'http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/04/18/krauthammer-predicts-obamas-2012-campaign-will-be-the-dirtiest-in-history-chris-hahn-and-chris-plante-weigh-in/',%20501214409L)#comment-501214409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How could anyone think the Democrats/socialists/Obamanites would have a dirty political campaign? Will someone tell me a of a clean campaign by the Democrats? I am waiting, waiting, waiting, ect, etc, etc...............&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama: Prosperity comes from bottom, not top</title><link>(u'http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/18/obama-prosperity-comes-bottom-not-top/',%20501302190L)#comment-501302190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Obama socialist agenda is hiding as caring for the 99% at a cost to the 1% and is as phony as socialism itself. Socialism has impoverished or kept more people poor than any system of government existing today. Europe is socialist! How is unemployment and socilaist redistribution doing in Europe? Socialist Argentina is nationalizing socialist Spains oil industry; whopee for the redistribution of nationalization. Obama gave $2B dollars to Brazil for deep water drilling; nation to nation redistribution strikes again. Obama's redistribution is about forming a powerful government, not a healthy population. Socialism is about power over people, not the power of the people over government. &lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats Call for New Amendment to Limit First Amendment Rights</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/536443',%20504833320L)#comment-504833320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Democrats are attempting to control the speech of individuals in corportations. A corporation is nothing more than a group of people working together in a business. The people in corporations have first amendment rights because they are citizens of our Republic. The Democrats are at their usual stand. They are attempting to gain control of those they can't legally control by assigning them a phantom name and pretending to control the phantom entity the Democrats assigned to them. In this case the Democrat's phantom is corporations. &lt;br&gt;Will the Democrats/socialists prevent corporations from speaking out for socilaism it they gain control of our laws.&lt;br&gt;The definition of our Republic is its constitution, all other defintions are wrong or incomplete. Our Republic and our constitution is ours. Neither was founded by a political party and no political party can claim or change our Rights.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EU parliament slams Argentina&amp;#039;s YPF seizure</title><link>(u'http://cnsnews.com/node/536641',%20504883913L)#comment-504883913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the Argentine takeover of Spain's YPF is a sign of the desperation of socialists on both sides of the Atlantic. The cross Atlantic activity may mean the EU is coming apart at the seems. International nationalization of one foreign socialist enterprize by a socialist nation on another continent (South American in this case) almost seems to be a threat to global socialism. The two separate socialist zones certainly are not fighting to  give money to the 1% socialists who are running those countries. No. Sir! They are fighting  over who gets the most oil billions to fork over to their respective 99%. The caring socialists know their country's 99%, in both cases, need the money.&lt;br&gt;I wish them both well. I hope they will treat this collective problem with reality.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:43:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog? «  Gretawire</title><link>(u'http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/open-thread/blog-138/',%20506500567L)#comment-506500567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have any of the Democrats dealt with what they are keeping from Mexico by making it easy to be an illegal alien in the U. S.? Here is a thought! The illegl aliens are people willing to take chances and do things for their families. Mexico is in a fight for its very life, with drug cartels attempting to ruin the Mexican government and take it for themselves. Mexico is sadly in need of people who  are capable of taking chances and doing things to preserve their families. We do not need the illegals in the U.S. and they can't do anything here that we can't do better ourselves. Mexico needs them! Do they have a duty to their own Mexico? Can Mexico use the help they are obviously capable of giving? Are they willing to take their duty to their own country seriously enough to help? I don't know the answere to those questions. If it was my country, I would be home, and I would help.&lt;br&gt;Marvin E. Fox &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marvin E. Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>