<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Buttink</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Buttink/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Buttink/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:20:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Have You Upgraded to Ubuntu 12.04? [Poll]</title><link>http://admin.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/04/have-you-upgraded-to-ubuntu-12-04-poll/#comment-512043332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking of waiting for the next mint release and trying out that honestly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Desura’s Gem</title><link>http://m.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/desura%e2%80%99s-gem/#comment-371256465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, what happends when you want to switch from ubuntu? You can make the same argument for Desura but at least I have some freedom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I don't really give a shit what devs feel is easy to do. Making software entirely cross platform isn't exactly easy. Then again making software for only one platform isn't going to help linux because we are on the bottom of the food chain. So, linux only is probably not going to happen to often (yes there is that one game). This means that arguing how many platforms to support really isn't even a point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:45:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Desura’s Gem</title><link>http://m.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/desura%e2%80%99s-gem/#comment-371249649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you read my post? Im saying to use one linux service over another linux service FOR PURCHASING GAMES. Although, I do use desura on windows from time to time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Desura’s Gem</title><link>http://m.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/desura%e2%80%99s-gem/#comment-371248933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Desura is not Ubuntu only" YAH that's exactly why you should use it over the UBUNTU SOFTWARE CENTER which is more limited in availability then Desura.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW I totally agree Desura shouldn't be installed via .deb. I didn't install via .deb, and no game should every be a .deb, mainly because it puts game data in a location I don't want it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Desura’s Gem</title><link>http://m.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/desura%e2%80%99s-gem/#comment-371006094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't use the ubuntu software center over desura if for no other reason then portability. I don't buy software for only Ubuntu.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:49:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video problems</title><link>http://spoonyexperiment.com/uncategorized/video-problems/#comment-288748477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why you no use regex to fix all of them? u betray ancient cs teaching me kill u now&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:14:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elementary OS &amp;#8216;Jupiter&amp;#8217; released, reviewed</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/elementary-os-jupiter-released-reviewed#comment-176358807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I can under stand that. I too have remade a application that probably could have been edited (pyRenamer). Plus, some applications desperately needed to be remade like Nautilus. It would be nice though if we had a bigger abstraction between front and back ends.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:00:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elementary OS &amp;#8216;Jupiter&amp;#8217; released, reviewed</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/elementary-os-jupiter-released-reviewed#comment-175925331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it just me or do you guys really wish the elementary team would make existing applications better looking then remaking an entire app to have a cleaner ui.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:13:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Bossanova announces contest, partnership with Desura</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/03/project-bossanova-announces-contest-partnership-with-desura/#comment-165384532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I still think a linux only game is a step backwards, I still would love a really good RPG for linux.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:59:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Counterfeit Lugaru has been removed from the App Store! - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2011/02/Counterfeit-Lugaru-has-been-removed-from-the-App-Store#comment-144146126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Attack the assholes not your customers. I like how wolfire never acts like a dick to the customer&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Project Bossanova</title><link>http://www.ubuntugamer.com/2011/02/announcing-project-bossanova/#comment-141898456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No gamer will EVER switch to Linux for one game.  Linux is already a strong alternative to Windows; the humble indie bundled showed that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I don't think playing the exclusivity card is what Linux is all about. Linux is not a snooty night club for douche bags. We might as well install Windows if we are going to use the same tactics we hate against them. This even screws over our Mac cousins. They deserve games too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:21:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing Project Bossanova</title><link>http://www.ubuntugamer.com/2011/02/announcing-project-bossanova/#comment-139604747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exclusive as in the only one on linux or Exclusive as in ONLY on linux? The 2nd would be stupid and counter productive to linux. I ask because the wording makes it sound like the 2nd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Force quit with style, yo</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/01/force-quit-with-style-yo/#comment-124720089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats really cool. I would make the dark overlay a bit more translucent though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:14:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can't buy the bundle, but haven't pirated it? - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/12/Can-t-buy-the-bundle-but-haven-t-pirated-it#comment-119038383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YOU CANT DO THIS PIRATES ARE EVIL PEOPLE WHO DESERVE TO BE MURDERED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! EAOTIHEIOTHAEWOITHIOEAHT&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suck at trolling &amp;gt;.&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:36:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which game should get multitouch support first?</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/11/which-game-should-get-multitouch-support-first/#comment-102886707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, unfortunately you still do have to pay for the art assets (AKA the game).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:19:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which game should get multitouch support first?</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/11/which-game-should-get-multitouch-support-first/#comment-102338056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vote:Aquaria&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did want world of goo but that doesn't require multi touch only single&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Foley sounds - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/11/More-Foley-sounds#comment-95210388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Crap it did say that, I just read the rss title and watched the youtube video.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Foley sounds - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/11/More-Foley-sounds#comment-95002882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No more whooshing wind sound?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clementine music player goes mono&amp;hellip;</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/10/clementine-music-player-adds-animated-mono-tray-icon/#comment-87766057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow ... a little mono jab. We all know of Banshee. Enough said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:10:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First foley sound effects test - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/10/First-foley-sound-effects-test#comment-85823160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The sound for wind rushing against you seemed a bit loud. The fastest speed seemed right but the slow walking/running was really loud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 23:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SIMD optimization - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/09/SIMD-optimization#comment-80448760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Being that low percentage (linux market share), I dont feel that it is fair to that minuscule percentage of people. Also if we are doing this is C/C++, we can cheat a little and use preprocessor directives to eliminate the all the overhead. I'm pretty sure we could also use a inline static functions. To me, this is like writing a CUDA program. They are freaking amazing, but you have to have some way for the other percentage of users to use your program as well. (they added x86 support WOoooo) Then again, the compiler could already be inserting code for when SSE is not there IDK. I'v always assumed it didn't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SIMD optimization - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/09/SIMD-optimization#comment-79987735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is such a pain in the ass though. To retain your sanity, you basically make a abstract class with all the instructions you want. Then, implement both the SIMD and normal instruction classes. (NOTE Im paranoid that SOMEONE wont have a simd enabled processor) FINALLY, make a factory to decide which class to use. This is cool, but when the compiler optimizes it into your code its fucking fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dropbox Givaway | Ubuntu Root</title><link>http://www.ubunturoot.com/2010/09/dropbox-givaway.html#comment-78773776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Woot 5x the POWA!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 02:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rhythmbox finally gets the update Maverick testers have longed for&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/09/rhythmbox-finally-gets-the-update-maverick-testers-have-longed-for/#comment-76767139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone else think we should add a new button (or make the close button different .. like a circle or something) for applications that only hide when closed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenGL update - Wolfire Games Blog</title><link>http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/08/OpenGL-update#comment-70388801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I still wish they would just suck it up and make an OOP wrapper so that all the people complaining about that would shut up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buttink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>