<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of BrianHealy</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/BrianHealy/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/BrianHealy/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:48:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Patent Filing for Google Mobile Search Provides Indexing Clues</title><link>(u'http://searchengineland.com/patent-filing-for-google-mobile-search-provides-indexing-clues-10155',%20474929485L)#comment-474929485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bringing this to SearchEngineLand and for the quick link update! I may have missed this patent had you not made the effort to share and so this is a helpful post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:08:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search Marketers Share Flickr Photos</title><link>(u'http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/search-marketers-share-flickr-photos.html',%209410855L)#comment-9410855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Andy. I'll let you know how it goes!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:35:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shameless Solicitation for MyBlogLog Community and MBL Security Issue</title><link>(u'http://www.stuntduble.com/2007/01/22/mybloglog/',%20720660579L)#comment-720660579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hehe. I think the system works well. MBL is set up so that I auto-join you if I view your blog ten times.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All you have to do is lure me in from Google Reader a few more times...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Custom Search for Search Engine Marketing Sites</title><link>(u'http://www.stuntduble.com/2007/01/24/seo-cse/',%20720662771L)#comment-720662771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great idea. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:13:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing the Marketing Pilgrim Job Board for Internet Marketing Jobs</title><link>(u'http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/01/internet-marketing-jobs.html',%209411605L)#comment-9411605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey. Cool. Not only is this a good source of income for Marketing Pilgrim I think jobs have a style and professional quality far above yet-an-other affiliate link or shoehorned AdSense slot.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good addition to the site!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Has More SEO Value:  An Image File Name or ALT Attribute?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/007366.html',%20105182290L)#comment-105182290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good find. Frankly it's easier to find people who talk about the "alt tag" than it is to find sensible forum discussions on the alt attribute these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Historically, the file name is most important - the point that it would be hard to find a picture of a cANAL. However, with the addition of Sitemap XML for images it has all changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Has More SEO Value:  An Image File Name or ALT Attribute?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/007366.html',%2098819791L)#comment-98819791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good find. Frankly it's easier to find people who talk about the "alt tag" than it is to find sensible forum discussions on the alt attribute these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Historically, the file name is most important - the point that it would be hard to find a picture of a cANAL. However, with the addition of Sitemap XML for images it has all changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which Has More SEO Value:  An Image File Name or ALT Attribute?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/007366.html',%2089179287L)#comment-89179287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good find. Frankly it's easier to find people who talk about the "alt tag" than it is to find sensible forum discussions on the alt attribute these days.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Historically, the file name is most important - the point that it would be hard to find a picture of a cANAL. However, with the addition of Sitemap XML for images it has all changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Search Love Triangle: Ask.com Wants Those Looking For Yahoo.com On Google.com</title><link>(u'http://searchengineland.com/search-love-triangle-askcom-wants-those-looking-for-yahoocom-on-googlecom-10495',%20474933187L)#comment-474933187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh. Catchy title - just in time for Valentines Day. I noticed Ask doing this back in October 2006 (&lt;a href="http://blog.arhg.net/2006/10/askcom-bidding-on-yahoocom-in.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.arhg.net/2006/10/askcom-bidding-on-yahoocom-in.html"&gt;screen shot&lt;/a&gt;)  If they've re-started then perhaps the tactic works for them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Design Update For Search Engine Roundtable</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012511.html',%20105182839L)#comment-105182839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hiya, just to chime in with everyone else and say how much I like the new look. You've got that balance between "corporate" and "stylish" right (who said "corporate style" was an oxymoron?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's good to see thought leaders like Search Engine Roundtable include Google's Custom Search as part of the core design and not an awkward add-on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Design Update For Search Engine Roundtable</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012511.html',%2098820526L)#comment-98820526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hiya, just to chime in with everyone else and say how much I like the new look. You've got that balance between "corporate" and "stylish" right (who said "corporate style" was an oxymoron?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's good to see thought leaders like Search Engine Roundtable include Google's Custom Search as part of the core design and not an awkward add-on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Design Update For Search Engine Roundtable</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012511.html',%2089179835L)#comment-89179835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hiya, just to chime in with everyone else and say how much I like the new look. You've got that balance between "corporate" and "stylish" right (who said "corporate style" was an oxymoron?).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's good to see thought leaders like Search Engine Roundtable include Google's Custom Search as part of the core design and not an awkward add-on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The big day has finally arrived&amp;#8230;.</title><link>(u'http://www.10e20.com/blog/2007/03/16/the-big-day-has-finally-arrived/',%2016679901L)#comment-16679901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations to the pair of you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog...Why Am I Doing This Again?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012822.html',%20105183498L)#comment-105183498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do I do it? It is fun to see who turns up on my blog. For a long while I was even saddo enough to screen capture popular visitors!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog...Why Am I Doing This Again?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012822.html',%2098821306L)#comment-98821306</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do I do it? It is fun to see who turns up on my blog. For a long while I was even saddo enough to screen capture popular visitors!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog...Why Am I Doing This Again?</title><link>(u'http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/012822.html',%2089180462L)#comment-89180462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do I do it? It is fun to see who turns up on my blog. For a long while I was even saddo enough to screen capture popular visitors!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want Your RSS Feed!</title><link>(u'http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/03/i-want-your-rss-feed.html',%209412980L)#comment-9412980</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Classic idea. I'm going to use it - I'm going to come back to this list you're building and go through it looking for blogs worth watching.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the mean time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.arhg.net/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.arhg.net/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss"&gt;http://blog.arhg.net/feeds/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are some noteworthy names on your list already. I'd say some of those are well on their way to becoming "A-list"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MyBlogLog a Bunch of Schmoes?</title><link>(u'http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/mybloglog-a-bunch-of-schmoes.html',%209414906L)#comment-9414906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robyn did comment to say, "I love social media people, shoot I'm a social media junkie myself. Social Media Optimizer was a good way to explain what spammers do when they take social media applications and game them (optimize is a kind word).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No SMO hate here, I promise!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;... still, there is sometimes a tendency for people inside the search networks to refer to any external influence as "spam". It's an easy but inaccurate dangerous oversimplification.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:04:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Endings Commission Payments In Europe, Middle East &amp;#038; Africa</title><link>(u'http://searchengineland.com/google-endings-commission-payments-in-europe-middle-east-africa-12252',%20474944267L)#comment-474944267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I was ever on a call to Google and if a Googler ever once accidentally referred to "kickback" rather than Best Practice Funding - and if there was ever then one of those silences when some people struggled not to laugh - then I'd not be able to talk about it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There were some restrictions to the program. In a way that's why some people are pleased that it is going - not every European agency qualified. You needed to have at least two members of staff to have passed the latest GAP. You needed to spend enough (hence the 'Growth Kicker' bonus) and only certain websites qualified.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Life will be more transparent with the BPF gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:27:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>(u'http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html',%2010991628L)#comment-10991628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good spot and good post however I really doubt Wordpress will loose anything near 50% of its value!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Answers.com Answerlinks Plugin &amp;#8211; How Much Are Those Links Worth?</title><link>(u'http://andybeard.eu/1041/answerscom-answerlinks-plugin-how-much-are-those-links-worth.html',%2012526090L)#comment-12526090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good spot and good post however I really doubt Wordpress will loose anything near 50% of its value!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gosh. We can tell what you think of Wordpress :) It's a great big link landscape for you :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Integration doesn't work - custom domain on blogger</title><link>('https://disqus.com/home/discussion/disqus/integration_doesnt_work_custom_domain_on_blogger/',%2015311L)#comment-15311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I emailed help@disqus.com as requested. I'm afraid I've not had a response nor am I any further forward with the integration. Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:18:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New domain: SearchBeest.com</title><link>(u'http://searchbeest.com/2007/11/20/new-domain-searchbeestcom/',%2016499149L)#comment-16499149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good stuff! I can confirm that the RSS feed seemed to switch over fine. Google Reader's automatically moved me to &lt;a href="http://SearchBesst.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="SearchBesst.com"&gt;SearchBesst.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Internet Marketing Blog Posts of 2007</title><link>(u'http://www.techipedia.com/2007/internet-marketing-best-blog-posts/',%2014968920L)#comment-14968920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow. That's a superb list of posts - I might make it required reading for all of the company's 2008 new starts! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:20:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Reader needs GPC</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/26/google-reader-needs-gpc/',%209696990L)#comment-9696990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It has to be option (1) - doesn't it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Otherwise we're asking Google to find the lowest common denominator of its user base and go at that speed only.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>