<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Beerio</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Beerio/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Beerio/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:41:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: These People Are NOT Kidding Around With Their Soapbox Cars</title><link>http://www.wired.com/2015/10/alan-powdrill-soapbox-cars-racing/#comment-2286519376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice cars, but poor quality photoshopping of the backgrounds. Lighting is very off.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:41:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Busking Economics</title><link>http://www.hopesandfears.com/hopes/future/economics/216567-busking-economics#comment-2283827057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The article, although well written and interesting in it's own right, bears almost no relation whatsoever to the title. Poor editing I suspect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McKinsey Tells Banks to Focus on Making Money</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-20/mckinsey-tells-banks-to-focus-on-making-money.html#comment-1133323810</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't tell whether this is really deep or profoundly stupid. I'm going with "meh"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:45:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crazy Plan to Privatize Fannie Is ... Pretty Good?</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-14/crazy-plan-to-privatize-fannie-is-pretty-good-.html#comment-1124535181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love how these posts about Fannie and Freddie bring out the crazies in force. If Matt is paid based off volume (and possibly craziness?) of comments then expect to see many more articles like this...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Levine on Wall Street: Morgan Stanley, Retail Brokerage</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-15/levine-on-wall-street-morgan-stanley-retail-brokerage.html#comment-1124489168</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like how you switch up fonts at the end there, makes people pay attention. Or makes them think you did a typical salesman's ctrl-c ctrl-v job....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:00:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today in Why Aren't More Bankers in Jail</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-13/today-in-why-aren-t-more-bankers-in-jail.html#comment-1121870545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm taking credit for this one after the Prison discussion on the last post...&lt;br&gt;The writing in this post is as "Matt" as I've seen since the DB days - just needs a few charts and we're back to the best.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Levine on Wall Street: BofA Battleship</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-13/levine-on-wall-street-bofa-battleship.html#comment-1121392502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So successful have we been in privatizing prisons that they've seen dramatic growth since we did - 2.9% of the population either in jail or on probation! At the current rate we'll soon have all of our urban poor incarcerated thus solving the problem of providing them health insurance. A clear win!&lt;br&gt;Yet another area where the US leads the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Financial Innovation Is Depressing</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-11/financial-innovation-is-depressing.html#comment-1119917818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude - smoke AFTER commenting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Levine on Wall Street: Practice Activists</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-12/levine-on-wall-street-practice-activists.html#comment-1119509350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this spam is targetting the wrong blog. 10k a month? That's only 120k a year pre-tax. How many of Matt's readers make less than that at their actual jobs which exist as a real thing?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Levine on Wall Street: Bailouts Past and Future</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-08/levine-on-wall-street-bailouts-past-and-future.html#comment-1113989405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The long comments below me talking about how the government have been making way too much money on their Fannie and Freddie investments all bear some striking similarities. I will take some real convincing to believe that they're not related to each other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Paint my bottom blue and call me a conspiracist, but my guess is they're either from shareholders or the companies themselves!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Levine on Wall Street: Bailouts Past and Future</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-08/levine-on-wall-street-bailouts-past-and-future.html#comment-1113844964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There was definitely scope for footnotes here. Maybe something about Gasbag and his history of douchery? Come on Matt, you can do it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:13:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whiny Oil Traders Pretty Sure Their Market Is Rigged</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-06/whiny-oil-traders-pretty-sure-their-market-is-rigged.html#comment-1111392413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where's Geezer Oil Trader when you need him?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Football Player Derivatives Are the Best Derivatives</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01/football-player-derivatives-are-the-best-derivatives.html#comment-1108546316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This occured to me too, but I think the potential for discharging the contract in bankruptcy makes it unworkable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Football Player Derivatives Are the Best Derivatives</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01/football-player-derivatives-are-the-best-derivatives.html#comment-1108545132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Came for the footnotes, was not disappointed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RBS Promises Not to Trade Against Clients Too Much</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-30/rbs-promises-not-to-trade-against-clients-too-much.html#comment-1102571091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The real scandal here is the morons who want the WM fix without having to pay for the privilege of getting it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mint the Premium Bonds!</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/mint-the-premium-bonds-.html#comment-1067679529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article Matt, and it's probably the most elegant solution I'm seeing proposed at the moment (other than the extremely unlikely one of either increasing or doing away with the ceiling).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While we wait to see what happens, can you arrange for cool footnotes along the lines of the ones on the WhatIf? comic? You click on them and a little text box appears which is closable? More useful and elegant than either the current debacle or the old DB hyperlinks.... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Wants to Fire Jamie Dimon?</title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-30/who-wants-to-fire-jamie-dimon-.html#comment-1064840541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*** If you're like me, you're mostly reading the comments to find out where the missing footnote is....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Are the Feds Protecting SAC Capital's Investors? </title><link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-24/why-are-the-feds-protecting-sac-capital-s-investors-.html#comment-1057328292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm starting to think that Matt posts so many stories about Steve Cohen because Steve looks like his chubby older brother.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://zwsop.tumblr.com/post/27088074046</title><link>http://zwsop.tumblr.com/post/27088074046#comment-586878690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bummer. Next year!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top secret trikes!</title><link>http://www.shipsbiscuit.com/2009/04/27/top-secret-trikes/#comment-8737571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Must say they look fairly uncomfortable though...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:33:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s new &amp;#8216;Timeline&amp;#8217; and &amp;#8216;Similar Image&amp;#8217; search</title><link>http://www.shipsbiscuit.com/2009/04/21/googles-new-timeline-and-similar-image-search/#comment-8489317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious... does the Google News Search allow you to go far enough back in time to see the last time "the mighty ‘Tottenham Hotspurs’" won the league? Or is it restricted to AD?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beerio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:51:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>