Disqus - Latest Comments for Baldchemist

Re: Roofs vs. rooves

The Baldchemist — Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:13:35 -0000

Thank you. I try to be as versatile and as tolerant as possible with English language use. Roofs/rooves is understood by all but use of "like", and "I'm going" "oh my god" and the likes are spoiling an otherwise beautiful language.

Re: Tony Blair: People are still 'very abusive' to me 10 years after the Iraq War

The Baldchemist — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:18:08 -0000

But Tony, tell us what happened to the billions Ghadaffi invested in a
newly opened English Investment Institution -( yours?). Tell us where
the 20 million pounds to open it came from?
C'mon if you want us to like you again then tell us.

Re: Tony Blair: People are still 'very abusive' to me 10 years after the Iraq War

The Baldchemist — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:15:50 -0000

Re: Tony Blair: People are still 'very abusive' to me 10 years after the Iraq War

The Baldchemist — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:14:56 -0000

But Tony, tell us what happened to the billions Ghadaffi invested in a newly opened English Investment Institution -( yours?). Tell us where the 20 million pounds to open it came from?
C'mon if you want us to like you again then tell us.

Re: Nikon D600 - med fullformat för alla

The Baldchemist — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:50:40 -0000

Skit samma vilken kamera mest väsentligt är kompositionen, vinklar, hur man jobbar med olika ljus förhållanden, rörelse osv. Kan du inte det så Nikon D4 hjälps inte heller.
Vad sk ni göra med 25 MPs? Gör bilderna så stora som hus eller beskära dem som fan. Kom ihåg att köpa ordentliga objektiv också. Och mycket större minnes kort, (för klart är det du kör RAW filer?) Tänk er för innan du lägger ut pengar. Det tillkommer mycket extra utgifter sedan. Men lycka till.

Re: British firms offered shorter, more secure '.uk' web addresses

The Baldchemist — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:03:03 -0000

"more secure" eh? From who? Google? Facebook? Authorities? Don't make me laugh.

Re: Facebook raises fears with ad tracking

The Baldchemist — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:05:36 -0000

Let's be very clear, democracy doesn't exist and can never exist while we have debt, religion, corruption and Facebook. Any rights that we thought we had have never really existed.

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:07:53 -0000

What a pity that we have to discuss this over the net, as brilliant as it is. I thank you for your views and comments. I'm not out to win any argument or attempt to convince let me make that clear.

I have nothing personal what so ever against Royalty ( and I am well aware of the Queens popularity with the people) but if royalty's 'raison d'etré is to bring benefits to the country then me and a good few million Brits would like to know where and what they are. It seems that only the extreme elite (and that includes royalty) are better off than the man and woman in the street.
Attempting to unify religions? Why would religions want that? The hatred that has been created to the innocent and ignorant creates war machinery and profit for the likes of EADS BAE BOEING, Halliburton GEC to name a few.
Its the likes of the largest ten banks that run the World's economy (and what an oxymoron that is). Consumption, debt to consume and interest on the debt means that there is no democracy. Very soon there will be a central government in Europe run by undemocratically elected technocrats. Italy, Greece, Spain already have them. They are there solely to ensure bond holders (read banks) retain power and control.
While you are listing brutality don't forget Hennry Kissinger, that Nobel peace prize awarded piece of evil who ordered the total bombing of Cambodia.
You aren't telling me that children are born evil are you? That's an indoctrination by Catholics, Christians, Jews, Muslims etc. Look at Northern Ireland!
Regarding philosophy, well, it has contributed nothing new for more that 150 years. Physics answers most a lot more credibly that religion and philosophy.
Great to communicate with you. Take good care and remember to get and give as much joy as you can everyday. :-)

Re: Facebook switches off facial reconition after privacy investigation

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:53:07 -0000

That bad eh? I guess its far too late then.Thanks

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:51:55 -0000

Just one question. Why does the World (or the UK) have any need for philanthropy?
Morality isn't dependant on titles or Royalty is it. In most of us altruism and morality isn't dependant upon religion or royalty.

Most of us are born decent human beings but only after we have been indoctrinated with God, Queen and country does the need for war arise. Wars financed by your list of Rockefeller, Getty, Buffet etc but let me add a few more Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan the privately owned Fred Reserve, IMF, ECB . Sorry my friend, either you are extremely rich or totally unaware of reality ( I don't want to use the word ignorant). The World is in a very very serious crisis and no amount of empty platitudes will solve any of it.

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 06:17:50 -0000

Well, that's a little judgemental on your behalf that it would be "beneath me". If that's your perception of them then no amount of solid argument will convince you otherwise. But I'm of the opinion that the UK is a country for all and not just for a few.

It's nothing to do with left or communism either. Not even liberal which I'm often incorrectly being accused of but for a little more egalitarianism. Being born into positions of power isn't conducive to altruism. We fight for "democracy",which doesn't exist where debt, religion or royalty is concerned and then allow the same rubbish to continue.
"Tireless in their work" where are the results for the subjects?
Or are we still as Lord Cardigan would have us killed for God, King and country?

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:42:27 -0000

But the Queen is the head of religion of "any kind is backwards, and should be castigated for it's sins to humanity." the C of E. The Duke of Devonshire is also a part that. Tony Benn seems like a decent sort and there I agree. I didn't mean "ALL" the people.

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:19:25 -0000

Because any replacement would have a similar character. Its rampant in Britain. Perhaps the World's most idiotic and hypocritical bunch. We've been fed too much Royalty and religion.

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:16:56 -0000

In that case it doesn't matter then does it? So lets be getting back to more important matters. Whose Rooney shagging this week?

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:15:39 -0000

You'll understand why there are very few qualified? Says nothing of intelligence or reasoning ability. Just do as you're told.

Re: I don’t believe that Andrew Mitchell let loose the explosive P-word

The Baldchemist — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0000

Let's get this straight, there is nothing wrong with being plebeian. Most of the World fits the description. It's well known that if you give a uniform to some then a transformation including megalomania, delusions of grandeur, over zealousness, paranoia, to shield a massive inferiority complex appears. That applies even more so to politicians.
Oh, and before someone writes in pointing out that I may also have the symptoms, you're probably correct.
Mitchell apparently also said " You are supposed to be f''''''''g helping us". Which sounds about right, helping the few keep the plebs under control for the Investment Institutions.
But what's the big deal? He thought at the time exactly what he said! We do it all the time. If it's good enough for the plebs then surely the suited idiots in Whitehall are allowed? They are after all "plebs" themselves.

Re: Facebook switches off facial reconition after privacy investigation

The Baldchemist — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 01:36:27 -0000

Facebook have contacted me and some of my friends who AREN'T on Facebook. That means they have accessed my mail contacts list. Now show me where it say s that they can do that.
It also along with Iphone says that I am in places that I'm not! Be aware that privacy and democracy don't exist.

Re: David Cameron must find a way to stop the takeover of BAE systems

The Baldchemist — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:44:27 -0000

In the 1990s there was a grand plan to combine many of Europe's largest
defence and aerospace companies into a giant capable of competing with
American rivals. What I want to know is, who they intend to sell it all to? And to use against what terror? War and war machinery account for at least a third of the World's GDP.
But just look at who is looking after it all. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Lazard, UBS and Morgan Chase! The same banks who finance wars!
More of our money going abroad. Bloody wake up Briatain! You've been taken for a massive ride and the chances of getting your money back and some sense of being British are Zilch, nada, Sweet FA.

Re: Debt crisis: live

The Baldchemist — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:24:52 -0000

"a big banker" was Rothschild.

Re: A global NHS? What a shameful idea

The Baldchemist — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:07:54 -0000

Well, 13.6% of 6.8 billion people are starving and live on lsss that a pound a day. 1.9 billion suffer from chronic hunger this had increased every year since 1969.

The number in Africa living (surviving) in increased poverty has increased more than anywhere. That poverty is the cause there is no doubt but beggars the question why are there so many poor people?

Hunger causes poverty and thus of hunger.
There is no triumph of modern civilization there Thomas.

Perhaps I can out this into some form of perspective :
In the First World countries, we only have a 1 percent growth rate. But that 1 percent growth rate affects the planet eight times as much as the 23 percent growth rate of the lesser-developed countries. The reason for this is that we use a lot more resources to maintain our standard of living. Currently it costs 30 times as much in terms of energy and resources to feed a North American as it does to feed a Pakistani.

Got a bit off track here Thomas. Have a great day.

Re: A global NHS? What a shameful idea

The Baldchemist — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:46:06 -0000

We'll have to differ there Thomas. I am sure and you don't need to look further than the quality of life in most parts of the UK that have been on the decline for quite some time.
Other than that I've spent 30 years visiting countries around the World documenting conditions so although I don't want to get into arguing, I think we close our eyes to reality.
When I said "I wasn't sure" it was meant as a pointer rather than a statement of fact. I don't put myself forward as an"expert" but of an honest observer.

Re: A global NHS? What a shameful idea

The Baldchemist — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:30:12 -0000

That may well be true of the more affluent West but I'm not sure about places in Africa, South America, India, and most of mainland China (OK wealth has increased for few there) etc. But then again I guess it depends on how altruistic one is. Should we care about all or just a few? Capitalism requires at minimum of 3%compound growth pa. An impossibility in the long run for all to benefit.

Re: A global NHS? What a shameful idea

The Baldchemist — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:51:09 -0000

"and that is what has given the world its unprecedented current prosperity" Sorry Thomas but you must be residing in the Cayman Islands. The World is in a phenomenally bad financial situation. Countries are crumbling under debt.There is more poverty that ever.

Re: Angela Merkel warns 'time is of essence' on euro crisis

The Baldchemist — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:09:35 -0000

The solution, although not simple is to let the "lenders" get a massive haircut, we stop paying interest to them on what is our own money and get the money back into public hands where it belongs.

Re: Libor: the five stages of grief

The Baldchemist — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:07:08 -0000

Never mind just paying a couple of hundred million fine on 2,5 billion. Pay the lot back and put it into the pension funds that they have robbed over the years.