<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Asma</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Asma/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Asma/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:45:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hotels and Cancer - can they be more responsible somehow?</title><link>http://www.socialbridges.org/2008/06/06/hotels-and-cancer-can-they-be-more-responsible-somehow/#comment-613184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But at least they are telling you. Even though after checking in to the room.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; In Pakistan, you don't even get to know of the prospective harms. I was shocked when my brother told me that in Shifa (One of the top hospitals in Islamabad), the radiations emitting from their Radiation room, used for radio therapies, are strong enough to reach even their roof ... a few stories high. The radiation room is &lt;i&gt;just&lt;/i&gt; not strong enough to cut the radiation leakage out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ironically, hospital authorities are not liable to inform their patients and families about this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the article above, I'm confused on the Californian law. The retardants are banned yet the hotels SHOULD use them??&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Asma</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>