<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Artagra</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Artagra/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Artagra/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:52:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: test post for comments - unregistered users</title><link>http://www.theslice.co.za/?p=15#comment-9470225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;moo lets check fi this works&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artagra</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:52:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Signs of a maturing web?</title><link>http://www.unodewaal.com/2008/06/20/signs-of-a-maturing-web/#comment-717519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting theory :D Good post!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the one hand, I agree completely. The level of quality and integrity of design that consumers are starting to demand is increasing all the time. However, the decreasing costs of hardware and software, and the increasing efficiency of new tech tools (Rails, Python, Flex, etc) mean that pretty advanced and impressive software takes less man hours than ever before. I definitely agree with the implication that scaling requires more people, but I think this has always been the case?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artagra</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>