<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Arjun_Basu</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Arjun_Basu/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Arjun_Basu/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:48:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Anu Apte-Elford | Owner, Rob Roy</title><link>https://punchdrink.com/lookbook/anu-apte-elford-owner-rob-roy-no-anchor-navy-strength-seattle/#comment-4289376010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whenever someone is going to Seattle I tell them to go to Rob Roy and order the Gunpowder Punch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:48:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Content Marketing Agencies: The Ultimate List</title><link>http://www.curata.com/blog/content-marketing-agencies-list/#comment-2635811346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;spafax&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:31:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Consumers Spend Their Time Is Where Advertisers Should Spend Their Money</title><link>http://sixpixels.mirumagency.com/blog/archives/where-consumers-spend-their-time-is-where-advertisers-should-spend-their-money/#comment-2056873344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe ads don't work everywhere....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:31:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Internet Is Not Just Another Advertising Channel</title><link>http://sixpixels.mirumagency.com/blog/archives/the-internet-is-not-just-another-advertising-channel/#comment-1720628704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the digital agencies have also said some really stupid things. Like their tendency to look down at other media (especially print). Like their tendency to believe they are "the future" while thinking as lazily as everyone else. Anyone can say, anything, of course, they just have to prove it. On this front, traditional media has a harder time, yes, but digital folk has so much data they can mask poor numbers and still say they are doing fine by their client. I love digital agencies that lie by omission. Yes, yes, numbers are meant to be manipulated and the onus, in the end, is on the client to ask the right questions. One of the things that's become obvious is that many clients don't know what the right questions are in digital - and digital agencies are in no rush to help them out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, breakfast soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Internet Is Not Just Another Advertising Channel</title><link>http://sixpixels.mirumagency.com/blog/archives/the-internet-is-not-just-another-advertising-channel/#comment-1720492473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to say, with all due respect, my friend, that people like you are partially to blame. The digital space has been full of "cheerleaders" and "evangelists" and not enough people being critical of the space. I like to think we are the beginning of the end of the Era of Digital Hype, when we can take a step back and not talk so breathlessly about it and talk about it for what it is. Transformative? Absolutely. Misunderstand? Yes. But misunderstood by who? By which group? By a digital elite who can see everything (because they KNOW) or by the ignorant masses, who just "don't get it." If advertisers don't get it, the problem isn't them (and don't get me started on advertisers!) necessarily. Perhaps it's the messenger. Perhaps it's the industry itself. My guess is it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New York Bagels Do Not Suck</title><link>http://munchies.vice.com/articles/new-york-bagels-do-not-suck#comment-1652677620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Montreal is an island. And the Montreal bagel started in the dusty alleys of The Main and Mile End, a neighbourhood of tenements and cold water flats. And your thing about not slicing a Montreal bagel?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your arguments are made invalid by your ignorance. I guess ignorance really is bliss.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 22:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 Years of the Coens: &amp;quot;Raising Arizona&amp;quot;</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2014/09/30-years-of-the-coens-raising-arizona/379815/#comment-1582980744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The doctor told me her insides were a barren place where my seed could find no purchase.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- That's not just the best line in this movie, it's one of the best lines in every movie ever made.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Red Bull and LEGO Get a Leg Up with Branded Entertainment</title><link>https://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2014/02/red-bull-lego-branded-entertainment/#comment-1247981763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You guys (well, Robert) will be pleased to know that Ashley Brown from Coke is going to write a formal post (or rebuttal if you will) on Sparksheet. Soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Content Marketing Hijacked Content Strategy?</title><link>http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2014/02/content-marketing-hijacked-content-strategy/#comment-1233459284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's like I always say: content without strategy is just stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 44 Content Marketers to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://mcmurrytmg.com/articles/44-content-marketers-follow-twitter#comment-1152123005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honoured to be on this list!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Jon Bon Jovi going to buy and move the Buffalo Bills to Toronto?</title><link>http://sports.nationalpost.com/2013/11/24/is-jon-bon-jovi-going-to-buy-and-move-the-buffalo-bills-to-toronto/#comment-1139053517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm just saying all cities are parts of regions and are evaluated as such. If Toronto gets a team it's because of the size of the TV market, not the size of Toronto itself. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Jon Bon Jovi going to buy and move the Buffalo Bills to Toronto?</title><link>http://sports.nationalpost.com/2013/11/24/is-jon-bon-jovi-going-to-buy-and-move-the-buffalo-bills-to-toronto/#comment-1138808296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For you, yes. Cities are defined by city limits. For sports leagues, they are defined by the size of the market, or region, or more specifically, the TV market. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Jon Bon Jovi going to buy and move the Buffalo Bills to Toronto?</title><link>http://sports.nationalpost.com/2013/11/24/is-jon-bon-jovi-going-to-buy-and-move-the-buffalo-bills-to-toronto/#comment-1138247333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Toronto is NOT the 3rd largest market in North America. Toronto: the city, is the third largest in North America. Toronto the market (ie: region) is the 7th or 8th, just after Houston. Still big, but not 3rd.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:06:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good to go from the PM: The Harper era&amp;#8217;s decadent phase</title><link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/11/20/good-to-go-from-the-pm-the-harper-eras-decadent-phase/#comment-1131872990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We are entering ShakespeareLand here. Or at least Marloweville. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:45:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Malala Leaves Jon Stewart in Awe After Her &amp;#8216;Daily Show&amp;#8217; Appearance</title><link>http://theaerogram.com/malala-leaves-jon-stewart-awe-daily-show-appearance/#comment-1076725979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This morning I heard her interview on the CBC in Canada and she spoke about listening to Justin Bieber. She's a teenage girl and when an interviewer can bring out that part of her, the rest of her story becomes all the more amazing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRITING ON THE ETHER: Is Publishing&amp;#8217;s Star System Cuckoo?</title><link>http://janefriedman.com/2013/07/18/writing-on-the-ether-99/#comment-966904823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sadly, this just makes publishing more like every other entertainment business. Or at least it confirms it. Music. Movies. We are all blinded by the light of the glow of the superstar...living in shadows.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRITING ON THE ETHER: Time for Literary Fiction To Come Out of the Cloisters?</title><link>http://janefriedman.com/2013/07/11/writing-on-the-ether-98/#comment-964355839</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder, Porter, if poets and "poetry" have long ago already achieved a kind of acceptance of the state of things. Is "literature" going the way of "poetry" - meaning is it a style (and not even a genre!) and, well, not a very big selling one at that....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(love that this conversation continues!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:45:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRITING ON THE ETHER: Time for Literary Fiction To Come Out of the Cloisters?</title><link>http://janefriedman.com/2013/07/11/writing-on-the-ether-98/#comment-958989449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The idea of authors as brands points to a convergence of two different things that happened at the same time. Well, three: publisher marketing budgets went down and unless you were an A LIst author you weren't going to get any serious support (though I doubt it was ever THAT different), the rise of digital and self-publishing and with it the rise of the author-entrepreneur, AND the advent of social media.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRITING ON THE ETHER: Time for Literary Fiction To Come Out of the Cloisters?</title><link>http://janefriedman.com/2013/07/11/writing-on-the-ether-98/#comment-958698714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think with Anastas, he approached Twitter for the absolute wrong reason - ie: doing something he normally hates doing and then having to do it in a space he wasn't comfortable in and well, two wrongs don't make a right.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I may be a cad but I'm more than happy to be a Poster Child as well. I don't have the reach or history or brand of more well established writers, for sure, but I have an odd hybrid thing happening and we'll see how that translates. I may also be that odd literary duck in that I see very well the value in PR (!!!) and am not afraid to exploit it. Or be exploited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As long as everyone buys my books. I'm not literary, see. I'm just difficult.....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WRITING ON THE ETHER: Time for Literary Fiction To Come Out of the Cloisters?</title><link>http://janefriedman.com/2013/07/11/writing-on-the-ether-98/#comment-958593144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate labels. But I also understand the need for them from a marketing point of view. So we live in a world with people who hate labels who need them. I guess life is complicated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the "literary" thing, a large part of it has to do, of course, with the "artist's" aversion to commerce. If there's a pretention, it is that, and it's a big one. Let's see how "mysterious" I become when my novel is published in the spring. Because, for want of a better label, the damned thing is "literary."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:42:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Everything You Wanted to Know About &amp;#8216;The Internship’s Tiya Sircar (But Were Too Lazy To Google)</title><link>http://theaerogram.com/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-the-internships-tiya-sircar-but-were-too-lazy-to-google/#comment-956539686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Funny. A tweet from July 5th.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/arjunbasu/status/353164120478072832" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://twitter.com/arjunbasu/status/353164120478072832"&gt;https://twitter.com/arjunba...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Andrea Bargnani trade is a typical New York move.</title><link>http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/52358938/#comment-953070886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In two years time the best pro team in New York City might be the Islanders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let that sink in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Top 10 Favorite Spelling Bee Tweets</title><link>http://theaerogram.com/our-top-10-favorite-spelling-bee-tweets/#comment-914989183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Along the same lines, I called the Spelling Bee the NBA for "brown people." It's really quite remarkable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 09:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peering into the future and seeing more value in the Random Penguin merger</title><link>https://www.idealog.com/blog/peering-into-the-future-and-seeing-more-value-in-the-random-penguin-merger/#comment-720297363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, i was speaking of author, not form(s) or distribution. Agree on two and three. Let's just admit that the big publishing houses used to make the big writing discoveries. Heck, they used to edit books. Remember that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peering into the future and seeing more value in the Random Penguin merger</title><link>https://www.idealog.com/blog/peering-into-the-future-and-seeing-more-value-in-the-random-penguin-merger/#comment-720284040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More and more, the opportunity for the smaller publishers to push the culture (not necessarily the profits, mind you) is becoming apparent. The next great discovery will scarcely come from the Big 4 or 3 or 2 or 1. If they are risk adverse now (while admitting that the entire book publishing industry is about risk), they will be even more so in the near future.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun_Basu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:59:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>