<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for AngelaE8654</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/AngelaE8654/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/AngelaE8654/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:51:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ginsburg will remain on Supreme Court for &amp;#039;a while&amp;#039;</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/213896-ginsburg-will-remain-on-supreme-court-for-a-while#comment-1516803209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;She has a right to stay for as long as she wants to and I think it's rude to try to "get" her to retire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:51:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Anchor Bill Weir to Fox Nation: &amp;#8216;You Willfully Ignorant F*cksticks&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-anchor-bill-weir-to-fox-nation-you-willfully-ignorant-fcksticks/#comment-1516777099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't say!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Anchor Bill Weir to Fox Nation: &amp;#8216;You Willfully Ignorant F*cksticks&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-anchor-bill-weir-to-fox-nation-you-willfully-ignorant-fcksticks/#comment-1516775742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;EXACTLY.  And if we hadn't had "Global Warming" in our history, we'd &lt;b&gt;still be in an ice age!!&lt;/b&gt;  The Earth heats up, the Earth cools down.  That's how it's ALWAYS been.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Geraldo Rivera rips Matt Drudge</title><link>http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/07/geraldo-rivera-rips-matt-drudge-193142.html#comment-1513459753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  They just don't seem to get that.  Idiots.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Border Crisis Poll: Public Turns Against Obama, Democrats &amp; Media</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/30/border-crisi-american-people-turn-against-obama-democrats-media#comment-1513351904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Krauthammer : Obama's Amnesty Move Impeachable</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/07/30/Krauthammer-Obamas-Amnesty-Move-Impeachable#comment-1512603487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  Trying impeachment now would simply energize the Democrat base, who would think all the Republicans were simply being racist against poor old Obama.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King Offers Plan to Muster Conservative Support for Border Bill</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/30/King-Offers-Plan-to-Muster-Conservative-Support-for-Border-Bill#comment-1512599088</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So did I.  LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511504898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hear what you're saying.  However, what is your plan for &lt;b&gt;actually stopping&lt;/b&gt; Obama from being so lawless?  I'm not talking about a few Republicans trying to impeach him but failing to get the votes for it in the Senate.  I'm talking about &lt;b&gt;actually, truly, STOPPING&lt;/b&gt; Obama from breaking the law the way he's doing?  See what I mean?  I understand the push behind the Impeachment thing.   I truly do.  The problem is, that is going to rile up the Democratic Base which will go out EN FORCE to vote for Democrats in November and that could make things all that much worse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 02:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511361896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's true...he is.  However if the law is actually PASSED by both parties of Congress, then his "ignoring" it is not going to do the Democrats ANY favors at all.  And they will not appreciate that from someone they've supported for so long.  He's ignoring laws now.  He won't get impeached for real now because at this time, the Democrats will still back him up.  The Republicans can try and that will strengthen the Democrat base at this point.  However, it won't be that way forever.   Especially if the Republicans take the Senate in November.  After that time, it's possible he COULD be impeached, convicted, and removed from office.  But we need to bide our time right now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Collect More Than $7,000 Per Month for 'Fostering' Adult Illegal Aliens</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/07/29/Collect-More-Than-7-2-k-Per-Month-for-Fostering-Adult-Illegal-Aliens#comment-1511353321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why does it have to be ILLEGALS?  If these people &lt;i&gt;truly do&lt;/i&gt; have a humanitarian crisis in their countries, figure out a way where they can request asylum here and get it in an expedited manner.  All paperwork filled out and turned in.  Then team these families up with American families who can help look out for them and help them learn the ropes here.  Forget all this squandering of our tax dollars on people who have &lt;b&gt;broken the law&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511194823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that there needs to be a law that says Congress MUST review every "Executive Action" after 90 days and either give it a "green light" to keep it going or a "red light" to make it go away.  If Congress had to vote on EVERYTHING Obama does with his "pen and phone", he'd probably not be so quick to skirt the law all the time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511192964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's so stupid about passing a law that says an Executive Order stands for 90 days only and after 90 days, Congress needs to decide to KEEP the action or throw it out?  If it were the law that Congress had to review EVERY Presidential "Executive Action" why would that be stupid?  Are you saying that the rest of the actions of Congress are stupid, too?  Congress is an equal branch of Government with the President to provide "checks and balances".  What's wrong with Congress reviewing Executive Actions??  I don't understand...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511140787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I think the Democrats are HOPING the GOP tries to Impeach Obama so they can scream about how horrible the GOP is:  Remember the "Government Shutdown" that was as much Harry Reid and Obama's fault (they dug their heels in and REFUSED to negotiate) as it was the Republicans?  But the GOP got blamed by the Democrats AND the media for the entire thing. That's the type of thing that would happen with an impeachment attempt at this point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jeff Sessions: John Boehner 'Surrenders to a Lawless President'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/29/Jeff-Sessions-John-Boehner-Surrenders-To-A-Lawless-President#comment-1511138161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is, an "impeachment" (because of the numbers) will not actually lead to a conviction for Obama and trying to impeach him will empower the Democratic Base who will come out in droves in November to vote for the Democratic candidates.  If we don't take the Senate in November, things will be very, very, VERY bad for any type of Conservative action at all.  That's the problem; not that we don't think Obama should be stopped.  The problem is that the Democrats as well as some RINOs have been allowing Obama to do whatever the heck he wants to do.  If we can take the Senate and maintain the House, we can block Obama much better.  Then we need to pass laws limiting "Executive Action" for Presidents.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:27:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fearing Obama Unilateral Amnesty Threats, Tea Party Jams Congress's Phone Lines</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/28/Fearing-Obama-Unilateral-Amnesty-Threats-Tea-Party-Jams-Congress-Phone-Lines#comment-1509270863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you did that, you'd probably have the Secret Service knocking at your door.  Better to take care of things in a calm, but legal manner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama: A Country Without Rule of Law 'Will Not Succeed' </title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/28/Obama-A-Country-Without-Rule-Of-Law-Will-Not-Succeed#comment-1509085205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what *I* was thinking when I saw it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin: More Americans Will Support Impeachment if Obama Lawlessly Enacts Another Executive Amnesty</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/27/Sarah-Palin-More-Americans-Will-Support-Impeachment-if-Obama-Lawlessly-Enacts-Another-Executive-Amnesty#comment-1507491670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  And they also need to place ads telling the Public what is actually going on as the public believed the media last time when they were told to "Blame the Republicans" for the Government Shutdown.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palin: More Americans Will Support Impeachment if Obama Lawlessly Enacts Another Executive Amnesty</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/27/Sarah-Palin-More-Americans-Will-Support-Impeachment-if-Obama-Lawlessly-Enacts-Another-Executive-Amnesty#comment-1507378564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not even a "closet" lib.  Just a regular old lib.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYT: Legalize marijuana</title><link>http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/new-york-times-legalize-marijuana-109409.html#comment-1507371510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why?  So people can drive while under the influence like they are doing here in Washington?  People in the Service Industry like Food and Retail can wait on you while high, like they're doing here.  I see them outside on their breaks, smoking bongs.  Then they come in and they try to act right but can't quite "get it".  Yeah, you should have all of THAT in New York.  LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:00:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First lady: 2014 election key</title><link>http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/first-lady-2014-election-key-109412.html#comment-1507364226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it does.  "Compromise" to the Dems means "you agree with US and do what WE want".  That's their idea of "compromise".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Londoners Rally in Solidarity with Iraqi Christians</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/07/27/Londoners-Rally-in-Solidarity-with-Iraqi-Christians#comment-1507362054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brother Andrew of "God's Smuggler" fame says that the Muslims are much, much worse than the Communists EVER were.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 18:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Londoners Rally in Solidarity with Iraqi Christians</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/07/27/Londoners-Rally-in-Solidarity-with-Iraqi-Christians#comment-1506720875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We can never forget the Persecuted Church around the world.  Iraq is a major hot place for these Christian brothers and sisters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:50:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP Rank-In-File Discusses Ways To Take On Obama Over Amnesty, Including Impeachment</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/25/GOP-Special-Immigration-Conference#comment-1503660591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't see him handing out the millions he gets from his book royalties to folks on Skid Row.  He's a hypocrite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP Rank-In-File Discusses Ways To Take On Obama Over Amnesty, Including Impeachment</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/25/GOP-Special-Immigration-Conference#comment-1503654784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They tried that and the Democrats went ahead and shut down the government and then blamed it on the Republicans.  Notice that Harry Reid and Obama dug their heels in too and let the government get shut down?  So how can it be ALL the "Republicans Fault"??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ed Rendell: To the 'American People,' Ted Cruz 'Looks Like a Jerk'</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/07/24/Ed-Rendell-The-American-People-Think-Ted-Cruz-is-a-Jerk#comment-1502918513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Their idea of "coming together" means we all cave and let them have their way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngelaE8654</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:35:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>