<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Alexei</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Alexei/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Alexei/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:44:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Google Plus Dead On Arrival?</title><link>http://nowsourcing.com/2012/12/16/is-google-plus-dead-on-arrival/#comment-849760481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't have time, energy or inclination to start on ANY "social network", especially facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:44:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One bug report to rule them all</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/one-bug-report-to-rule-them-all.html#comment-1105157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, but that's not glamorous. I mean, its so much fun making windows wobble or icons rotate or creating some other super-duper feature. But creating an easy to use bug-reporting workflow? Bah! Bo-ring :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One bug report to rule them all</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/08/one-bug-report-to-rule-them-all.html#comment-1103740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, yeah. Look at me. I'm laughing. Ha. Ha. Ha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:12:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1091106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if you roll your mouse pointer over that stern face, you can see URL of disqus profile of the poster. I suppose that's how you can tell them apart.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rants heard 'round the community ver. 10</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/rants-heard-round-community-ver-10_31.html#comment-1081636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I absolutely hate Unix directory structure (whatsit called? there is an abbreviation, I just forgot it.. never mind), be it Linux or some commercial Unix. Methinks Unix was broken enough even before Linus came along (see Unix Hater's Handbook)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1058698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've got a better plan? Please share it with us, then.&lt;br&gt;Work on something better? I'm all for it. If it isn't another wobbly WM with 1337 FX that is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:35:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1058500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What are those virtual desktops good for, anyway?&lt;br&gt;I honestly don't understand why can't I just use the taskbar to manage open windows&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1058224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MWAHAHAHA!!!....&lt;br&gt;Blood, bloooood!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1050315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; but i've not yet heard of any CG blockbuster by Pixar or DreamCast entirely and proudly "made with Blender"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course. They have already made huge investments, both in terms of money AND in terms of effort, Blender would offer them NO benefit, who in their right mind would switch? Another point - when I watch, say, Shrek, I really don't care about the software it was made with, or what CPUs do they use at the render farm (or what OS. or how long did it take to render it.). This is nothing but trivia for the viewer (well, I am curious, but frankly I don't care much)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;About Maya: I actually wrote a couple of plugins for it (custom format exporters), about 5 years ago. I hate its UI (well, there are worse apps, much worse, but still).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suggesting Maya proves that 1) I used to work with it 2) I do not like Maya UI (artists I worked with loved Maya and hated Max, whereas I didn't really enjoy Maya API or UI, Max UI looks much cleaner)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In any event, Blender is one of the better FOSS apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1049110</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Blender is quite good IMO. It would be one example of success if anything ( &lt;a href="http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/index.php/download/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/index.php/download/"&gt;http://www.bigbuckbunny.org...&lt;/a&gt; ? I can't say i like characters much, but technically the quality is good)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the not-so pretty interface with roots in Unix widget sets (Motif?), try Maya.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:10:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1048283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, that name's got to go. Say what - let's name it "Pedophile", or better yet - GNU/Pedophile&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1047355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ptooey again&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1047313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad to know I'm not the only one to hate "Oubountou". Ptooey.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1047272</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too late for this guy :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you know, the strangest thing is that I really AM starting to see the point of "build everything" distros like Gentoo. Sure, its painful, but at least you can be sure everything is consistent (well, at least in theory, as I suspect in practice its much harder then configure / make / install)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lusers make me laugh ver.4</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/lusers-make-me-laugh-ver4.html#comment-1047224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too sweet to actually happen. Sigh.&lt;br&gt;(And yes, that's basically cloning OS X, which is a good thing IMO)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:30:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1037742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1. Windows / OS X market share is small compared to Linux? Wait a second, these words must have some other meaning I'm unaware of... hm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2. The only reason Linux has any market share on desktop (IMHO) is that it a) works at times (like, you only install stuff from your distro CD and lucky enough to have all your HW supported or simply don't care). Plus it happens to _look_ like a real, working, stable desktop OS. And, of course the fanboyism - they blow the flames hard enough to ensure there are always people willing to try out Linux (not that there are many)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or something like that, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:49:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1030354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I can't see why any GUI framework would be SO much easier to use then another (without their form designers). I've seen a couple of frameworks (and the worst designer is Netbeans' Swing form designer), but wouldn't recommend going without at least some kind of designer for anything more serious then Helloworld with any of them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for .NET, well, this little open source perversion of mine - &lt;a href="http://akireev.freehostia.com/focuspockus.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://akireev.freehostia.com/focuspockus.html"&gt;http://akireev.freehostia.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;was written mostly is a simple text editor, on a PDA (because I was bored out of my mind during bus rides :). Interface is simplistic, I admit, but doing C# forms w/o form designer is possible (although, again, I'd recommend against this approach), and easier then MFC without VS for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:44:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1027882</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox 3: This web site at &lt;a href="http://www.antivirusgolden.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.antivirusgolden.com"&gt;www.antivirusgolden.com&lt;/a&gt; has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Firefox is great. On Windows. This is where overwhelming majority of Firefox copies run.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1027686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vista isn't exactly a hit, if that's a consolation for you. Still, the point was that Linux' market share is negligible (not for all companies, of course, but smaller companies would be wise to ignore it). OS X is something completely different, Apple controls every aspect there - be it hardware or software (drivers, firmware). Linux, on the other hand, is highly fragmented. When "FOSS enthusiasts" start to understand that this lack of conformity (and stability) is their major long-term problem, then and only then may Linux gain in popularity on desktops. Not when another mega-killer WM with wobbling windows and rotating icons comes out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:45:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1027619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I'd like to see someone develop a really complex .NET app without Visual Studio and its nice features, such as Forms designer, intelli-sense, and all that mumbo jumbo. Probably not that productive, right?... well isn't that the whole purpose of .NET--to make Windows development easier? If you still have to use an IDE to get work done then what is the difference?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not that your point (writing a .NET app w/o VS) makes more sense, then, say, developing MFC app w/o VS, or developing a VCL app w/o Delphi or C++ Builder (or BDS or whatever they call it now), but have you heard about Sharp Develop? I have actually used it, and its good. I'm not sure if MonoDevelop is any good, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1021480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but GCC consistently generates bigger binaries then MS compilers (and they're free, too).&lt;br&gt;Intel compiler may be better then all those, though (never actually tried it)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1020429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where did I call him stupid? :P&lt;br&gt;He just likes toying with Linux, I guess, just like he likes toying with Brew or whatever.&lt;br&gt;Well, he's got time to play with those, good for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1019793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another thing, before some "FOSS enthusiast" comes and enlightens me about id Software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, I know about Carmack's fondness towards Linux and OpenGL. I've read his rants about how OpenGL is superior to DirectX back in 98 (or was it in 99?). It was a long time ago, however, and DirectX has matured since that time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wonder how much id earns from Linux customers, but I guess there's no way to tell (they give binaries for free and you have to buy Windows version for game contents, AFAIK). My guess is that Linux ports are rather Carmack's pet project then anything with a real purpose. Maybe he thinks Linux will mature and become another desktop market, who knows - companies do stuff that is not necessarily profitable at the moment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like he is not that hopeful anymore:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sathyasays.com/2007/09/20/john-carmack-not-as-interested-in-linux-and-opengl/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sathyasays.com/2007/09/20/john-carmack-not-as-interested-in-linux-and-opengl/"&gt;http://sathyasays.com/2007/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1019578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And I use Apollo ( &lt;a href="http://koti.welho.com/hylinen/apollo/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://koti.welho.com/hylinen/apollo/"&gt;http://koti.welho.com/hylin...&lt;/a&gt; )&lt;br&gt;It has a really simple, minimalistic interface (which is what I like about it). Its free. Its not FOSS. And there's no Linux version (but who cares?)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:57:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foxnews^H^H^H^Hconn conspiracy</title><link>http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/foxnewshhhhconn-conspiracy.html#comment-1019329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mwahaha! Games for Linux??!&lt;br&gt;You're kidding me (or, more correctly: lusers are). Why would any sane gamedev studio target desktop Linux(es)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Their total market share is 3% or less&lt;br&gt;2) There is no such OS as "Linux", there are about a dozen of partially compatible with each other "distros" (meaning, "Linux" is not a single target, its a bunch of targets)&lt;br&gt;3) Of those 3%, how many are willing to pay for the games, considering Linux users' disdain for proprietary software?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They may as well petition the Pope or General Secretary of UN&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexei</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>