<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for aleknovy</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/aleknovy/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/aleknovy/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:34:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387266477</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Update, the second accuser is also a "feminist pornstar"... Google them both.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:34:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387265744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Update: I did research and the second girl, joanne is also a "feminist pornstar". Why didn't the reporter of this piece do this research?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387261031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stoya also happens to be a feminist and SJW.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387259990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its also important to note that she's an SJW &amp;amp; feminist. I think the reporter of this story omitted mentioning a very important fact by not mentioning this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:30:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387257681</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stoya is a feminist that has blogged about "rape culture". So she's in the number one demographic most likely to falsely accuse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:29:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Female Performer Accuses Porn Star James Deen of Sexual Assault After Ex-Girlfriend’s Rape Claim</title><link>http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/11/30/another-female-performer-accuses-porn-star-james-deen-sexual-assault-ex-girlfriends-rape-claim/#comment-2387256044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know about the other two accusers (I will check)... but the first one (stoya) is an ardent feminist that believes in "rape culture". It's quite relevant to mention this fact.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:28:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Men Who Come Back Too Late Because They Don't Understand How A Woman's Heart Works</title><link>http://www.artparasites.com/about-men-who-come-back-too-late-because-they-dont-understand-how-a-womans-heart-works/#comment-2386960137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And chinese people can be extremely tall. What's your point?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A study on feminists called "the feminist paradox" showed that the stereotype is true. Feminists are on average much more masculinized than the average woman.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are there feminine women who identify as feminist? It's theoretically possible, but very rare.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Men Who Come Back Too Late Because They Don't Understand How A Woman's Heart Works</title><link>http://www.artparasites.com/about-men-who-come-back-too-late-because-they-dont-understand-how-a-womans-heart-works/#comment-2386959195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Typical feminist cult-member&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Men Who Come Back Too Late Because They Don't Understand How A Woman's Heart Works</title><link>http://www.artparasites.com/about-men-who-come-back-too-late-because-they-dont-understand-how-a-womans-heart-works/#comment-2386958634</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Believing in equal rights makes you an egalitarian, not a feminist. Feminism is a package that comes with other stuff, not merely "just equality"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;**The FULL definition of feminism includes believing:**&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) that gender roles are constructed and there's no (or little) innate difference between the sexes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Belief in a patriarchal conspiracy and other marxist tenants&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) The femininity is a construct enforced upon women by an evil opressive conspiracy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go and try to join a feminist organization if you don't believe in 1,2,3 - you will be shunned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:03:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Online Harassers Really Are Losers</title><link>http://www.iflscience.com/brain/online-harassers-really-are-losers#comment-2152677811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"For a start you could stop calling them 'feminists' because there is a big difference between feminists and extreme feminists... 99% of the worls feminists are just looking for equality."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;**Number One**&lt;br&gt;This is the "no true scotsman" fallacy, and its brought up anytime people (correctly) point out all the hipocrisy and bigotry in feminism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's the deal... FEMINISTS WHO ACTUALLY have **power**, **budgets**, sell millions of copies with their books and control government sectors, pass laws and have ACTUAL real world INFLUENCE - are what I'd define as as "real feminists".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not the nobodies who apparently are totally all aboutz zeee equality yo, yet have never passed a law, don't make a single cent from feminism, and have no power and influence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;**Number Two**&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if you are for "equality" that depends on how you DEFINE IT. Hint, MOST powerful feminists define equality as "One group gets to have the same results, positives, benefits and privileges as another group WITHOUT the same sacrifices, risks, and OBLIGATIONS"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Making sure that John gets the same number of apples as Bob (but ignoring that bob already has more oranges than John)... is one example of applying such "equality".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 04:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Study Probes Average Penis Size</title><link>http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/new-study-probes-average-penis-size#comment-1885614630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;""For example, only 5 men out of every 100 have an erect penis longer than 16 cm (6.3 inches)."&lt;br&gt;But if the 100 guys live on different parts of the globe... It's not a 100 guys living in the same city.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Study Probes Average Penis Size</title><link>http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/new-study-probes-average-penis-size#comment-1885612831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a meta-study averaging 20 other studies that themselves averaged all kinds of populations. So it's not "just caucasian and african"...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Study Probes Average Penis Size</title><link>http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/new-study-probes-average-penis-size#comment-1885605855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually these numbers are misleading as they're a global **arithmetic average**&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Certain continents/populations are bringing the global average down. An an eastern european looking at these numbers would feel an ego boost, thinking he's way above average and probably bigger than most guys in his city... except most of the city's residents are also above these numbers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:12:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If as many women killed themselves as men, we'd never hear the end of it </title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/active/mens-health/11377311/If-as-many-women-killed-themselves-as-men-wed-never-hear-the-end-of-it.html#comment-1828606904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, there was a study done on the "feminist paradox" where they compared feminists against the general female population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that study they found that the average feminist was many levels more masculine than the average woman (even the average man) specifically abnormally high levels of 2d:4d ratio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That ratio is determined while a fetus is still in the womb, and it's hardcoded for life. High-achieving men, athletes, and feminists have it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study didn't say anything about attractivness, but in general women are less attractive the more masculine they are, and feminists have been proven to be biologically hypermasculine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 04:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is this proof that men and women's brains really are wired differently?</title><link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11359399/Is-this-proof-that-men-and-womens-brains-really-are-wired-differently.html#comment-1820083223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This point comes up whenever there is a study that confirms what common sense already tells us...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BUT, consider this, you can not cite "common sense" when creating curriculum, passing laws or legislation. This is why research gets done to confirm common sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feminists have passed thousands of laws, rules and legislation that are based on the pre-supposition that men and women are NO DIFFERENT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They force school materials to teach that there's absolutely no difference between male and female brains and men and women. You can't argue with them by citing "common sense".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Teacher: Male rape victims should have kept &amp;#8220;their stupid mouths shut and enjoyed it.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/teacher-male-rape-victims-kept-stupid-mouths-shut-enjoyed/#comment-1815120972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You totally missed the point of the article. ITS NOT SAYING that consensual sex should be deemed rape.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's actually pointing out that these laws were passed to demonize men (evidence is that the same situation involving older female doesn't get enforced).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Teacher: Male rape victims should have kept &amp;#8220;their stupid mouths shut and enjoyed it.&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/teacher-male-rape-victims-kept-stupid-mouths-shut-enjoyed/#comment-1815117002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While you might be right that the Sandusky example was bad...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The double standard is that when an attractive male teacher accepts CONSENSUAL sex with a student, its deemed "rape".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If an attractive female teacher accepts or initiates consensual sex with a student, it's NOT deemed rape.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All else being equal men get 50% bigger sentences FOR THE SAME THING.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten More Ways Men Oppress Women With Their Everyday Lives </title><link>http://www.nationalreview.com/article/396565/ten-more-ways-men-oppress-women-their-everyday-lives#comment-1810427020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Feminism has gotten so absurd that it's difficult to even parody it these days. This isn't the first piece of satire to be mistaken for a genuine feminist article... in fact it's been like this for years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feminists have truly become a parody of themselves and gone beyond any possible satire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;In My Tribe&amp;#8221;: Common Ground Among MGTOW, MHRA, &amp;amp; Game Theory in a Post-Rodger Discourse</title><link>http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/in-my-tribe-common-ground-among-mgtow-mhra-game-theory-in-a-post-rodger-discourse-mra-pua/#comment-1478645620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Placebo also works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;In My Tribe&amp;#8221;: Common Ground Among MGTOW, MHRA, &amp;amp; Game Theory in a Post-Rodger Discourse</title><link>http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/in-my-tribe-common-ground-among-mgtow-mhra-game-theory-in-a-post-rodger-discourse-mra-pua/#comment-1478644786</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I find it ironic that the exact same Game principles and practices men have used to improve their lives and / or marriages at Married Man's Sex Life (MMSL) "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Says who? Scam artists like yourself. You're quoting yourself as a source now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:35:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;In My Tribe&amp;#8221;: Common Ground Among MGTOW, MHRA, &amp;amp; Game Theory in a Post-Rodger Discourse</title><link>http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/in-my-tribe-common-ground-among-mgtow-mhra-game-theory-in-a-post-rodger-discourse-mra-pua/#comment-1478642229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Game/PUA is the one community of men that's actually trying to help men have success with women"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, its trying to turn them into game addicts who spend years and thousands on books workshops and filler that overcomplicate a rather simple area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HERE IS THE ANSWER YOU SEEK:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) Leave the house&lt;br&gt;2) Accept that dating is a ***numbers game***&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Most women don't like you, that's fine, you wouldn't date most women either, the trick is developing a strategy where finding the one who's interested is as fun or painless as possible)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) Know that no coach/guru/fucktard has ever proven to beat the numbers game,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They've just invented hyper-convoluted ways of getting you to play the numbers game (i.e. you still make a move on 30 random women to get one). NOBODY has EVER proven to beat the numbers game, EVER (they will shame you, mock you, and insult you if you try to pin them on the issue, but trust me, I've spent 10 years challenging them to prove they can get "better-than-placebo" results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4) The more experience you get (the more hundreds of women you make a move on) the more you'll see patterns and be able to tell who are interested who aren't and thereby improve success rate (by simply intuiting better who'll respond favorably and who won't.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5 (bonus tip): Scammy shit like what you say, how you say it and other game nonsense only changes how the non-interested 29 respond, there is no evidence of it "creating attraction" or other nonsense bullshit. It just makes the 29 rejections less-harsh, that's it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[this advice is written based on the notion of success with random women. It represent the core behind any results anyone has ever gotten. Game takes this shit [the stuff that actually works] and adds layers of hundreds of over-complicating toxic bullshit. You only need these 4. THAT'S IT. Nobody has proven to beat these 4 (if they were to be the placebo to test again).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;In My Tribe&amp;#8221;: Common Ground Among MGTOW, MHRA, &amp;amp; Game Theory in a Post-Rodger Discourse</title><link>http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/in-my-tribe-common-ground-among-mgtow-mhra-game-theory-in-a-post-rodger-discourse-mra-pua/#comment-1476543525</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;game theory, and, yes, PickUp Artists, share one universal goal: that each boy/man can feel free to chart a course for his own life free from social conventions and laws that pre-emptively shame, marginalize, and punish him&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bullshit. I stopped reading after this line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's ONLY TWO movements on earth that systematically try to pussy shame young men. Feminists and gamers. There's ONLY TWO systematic idealogies that fear-monger men to BASE their worth based on female approval.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feminist: You only disagree with my logically incosistent pseudoscientific theories coz you can't get laid you basement dwelling fuck, shut up&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Manoshperian/Gameist: You only disagree with my logically incosistent pseudoscientific theories coz you can't get laid you basement dwelling fuck, shut up&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To claim otherwise is dishonest or ignorant, take your pick. MRA/MGTOW are the two movements about obliterating male gender roles and freeing up men. Feminists/Gamers who claim to be "liberating" men from traditional roles, are merely trying to shove news ones down their throats.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 11:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reports: Boko Haram village raids kill hundreds in Nigeria</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/05/world/africa/boko-haram-village-raids/index.html#comment-1425301578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is that when 100% of the victims are BOYS that cnn uses gender neutral terms like "People"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;100% of Boko Harem's murder victims in this attack and in EVERY attack they have ever made were exclusively BOYS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the one instance when it was gender-specific to girls (kidnapping girls) [oh and btw they killed all the boys before kidnapping the girls] - THE MEDIA mentioned that it was all girls getting kidnapped, not mentioning the MURDERED boys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we go again, 315 "people" ---&amp;gt; No, cnn, they were BOYS. Why is "femicide" a thing, but killing exclusively boys isn't ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
		Private: Our Sexual Assault Problem Is Nuanced, Layered, And Not Easily Understood Or Solved By A Hashtag Discussion		</title><link>http://thoughtcatalog.com/jamie-varon/2014/05/337772/#comment-1424328148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The most "wow" part of all this is that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a) A vast part of the female population is like this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b) They expect you to push hard enough to be attracted. (otherwise you're a wimp wuss)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;c) They expect you to know this without being told "hey I'm attracted to you, just push a bit more"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;d) If you push on the wrong woman, this is harassment, and now laws are passed to make this illegal in every area (not just workplace). But there is no foolproof way to know which woman is the right one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;e) Feminists (who make the laws and guidelines) literally don't admit that any woman anywhere has ever played hard to get ever. In fact, the leading feminist camp says that women ALWAYS show super-duper-enthusiastic interest at all times if they're attracted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(so unless a woman literally jumps at you, you can't make a move. Unless a woman literally moans "kiss me now", trying to kiss her would be "mouth rape", unless a woman is all grabby with you and talking about how much she'd like a date, you can't ask her out) etc etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 14:47:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ex-PUA Elliot Rodger commits mass-murder; Establishment attacks all non-feminists</title><link>https://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/ex-pua-elliot-rodger-commits-mass-murder-establishment-attacks-all-non-feminists/#comment-1406402497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"You are probably right, except many men need a little extra push in the right direction."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the PUA industry and DeAnusHole in particular fail at this. Just because you're the positive exception doesn't change the general rule.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was involved in that industry for 10 years, I'm still on the periphery of it. In most cases the industry creates paranoid over-analyzing keyboard jockeys with a drive for more information and acquiring more theories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It pushes few people out in to the real world to actually even get the placebo effect that a few (like you) get.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aleknovy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 09:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>