<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Aisling</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/Aisling/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/Aisling/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 08:59:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 
    
        Matt Gaetz comments over the weekend could be taken as an admission of guilty: Ex-prosecutor
    
</title><link>https://www.rawstory.com/matt-gaetz-joel-greenberg-plea-agreement/#comment-5386602383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose "naughty favors" sounds better to Gaetz than "whoremongering", but paying for sex is the same regardless of what he wants to call it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 08:59:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
    
        Trump smacked down for Easter morning statement showing 'resentment and rage' at losing election
    
</title><link>https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-rage/#comment-5329971722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So trump posts a truly ugly and irreverent Easter message, followed by a disclaimer that it was "Paid for by Save America and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee"?  And Save America is trump's own personal PAC.  Are they trying to protect him from his own remarks?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 11:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trump's Controversial Line Has a History</title><link>http://www.newser.com/story/291565/trumps-controversial-line-has-a-history.html#comment-4932822924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you get your information from right wing biased sources, you get a Republican sponsored brain full of misinformation.  trump tried to hide the dangers of the pandemic, tried to gaslight it away, took steps to undermine our first responders, continues trying to blame everyone else and still takes no responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 17:53:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trump's Controversial Line Has a History</title><link>http://www.newser.com/story/291565/trumps-controversial-line-has-a-history.html#comment-4932817142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bet Stephen Miller and trump's white supremacist base knew it before.  And I bet Miller is the one who suggested it to trump.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 17:47:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Naked Donald Trump statues pop up in several cities</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/291848-naked-donald-trump-statues-pop-up-in-several-cities#comment-2844538998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The nude statue of Trump is amusing.   Your regurgitation of lies about Hillary is pathetic, but typical of a Trumpster.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [GIVEAWAY] KORRES Castanea Arcadia Skincare Sets</title><link>https://www.faboverfifty.com/beauty/giveaway-castanea-skincare/#comment-2688830166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm interested in finding the very best facial products.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 23:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sanders wins majority of NY counties, despite Clinton victory</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/276936-sanders-wins-majority-of-ny-counties-despite-clinton#comment-2633960607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bernie won more counties, but Hillary got 200,000+ more votes across the state.  Delegates aren't awarded on either of those stats.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Romney team looking to block Trump at RNC</title><link>http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/271708-romney-team-looking-to-block-trump-at-rnc#comment-2550534058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trump has already made it clear what he thinks of his supporters by stating publicly:  "I love the poorly educated!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: National Nurses accuses Clinton campaign of trying to trick Bernie Sanders’ voters at Nevada caucuses</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/national-nurses-accuses-clinton-campaign-of-trying-to-trick-bernie-sanders-voters-at-nevada-caucuses/comments/#comment-2525488218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is this terribly different from the Sanders staffers who donned fake yellow union buttons to enter break areas at (at least) four Vegas hotels in order to try to sway members of  Culinary Union Local 226?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FBI Makes It Official: Hillary Rodham Clinton Is Under Investigation</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/02/08/fbi-makes-it-official-hillary-rodham-clinton-is-under-investigation/#comment-2507495843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;". . . working on matters related to former Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server" still doesn't mean they're investigating her.  Not that facts matter to conservatives.  As Colin Powell pointed out the other day, he also used a private server and so did Condi Rice's staff.  No one goes to prison for proper handling of documents that were not classified at the time they  received or shared them.  Duh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:44:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NBC News Rebuts Right-Wing Media Claim That Clinton Emails Reveal Names Of Undercover Operatives</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/02/04/nbc-news-rebuts-right-wing-media-claim-that-cli/208369#comment-2496020264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nonsense.  If a person receives a document with no security markings and reads, saves or passes it on and then it is later classified, the recipient certainly would not be held accountable.  Perhaps you should try reading the facts as outlined in this article before you make a judgement.  You're right that classified material is not a joke - but the fools who continue to lie about this issue certainly are.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:24:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sarah Palin blames Obama for her son&amp;#039;s domestic violence charge against a female</title><link>http://www.examiner.com/article/sarah-palin-blames-obama-for-her-son-s-domestic-violence-charge-against-a-female#comment-2469065951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Track is living with his parents.  (Does his girlfriend live there too?  If so, that certainly sets a fine example for the younger girls.)  If he's suffering from PTSD, why are they allowing him access to firearms?  Is he receiving treatment?  If not, why not?  Typical Palin (right wing) behavior - accept no personal responsibility.  And if he doesn't have PTSD, what a slap in the face to the many, many vets who do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:10:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
Politics:
Biggest loser in the GOP Debate on Fox Business: CNBC </title><link>http://www.caintv.com/biggest-loser-in-the-gop-debat#comment-2353816400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He wants to cut the Department of Education, IRS, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce and HUD.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bristol Palin: Starbucks cups &amp;#8216;are an attempt by the left to make Christians look stupid&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/bristol-palin-starbucks-cups-are-an-attempt-by-the-left-to-make-christians-look-stupid/comments/#comment-2352280861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Trump may not appreciate being called stupid by a Palin as he calls for a Starbucks boycott.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enter The Good Stuff&amp;#8217;s Fall Favorites Sweepstakes</title><link>https://www.coupons.com/thegoodstuff/fall-favorites-sweepstakes/#comment-2345160622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love the cooler weather and the gorgeous foliage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 20:45:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [GIVEAWAY &amp;#038; REVIEW] Linda Wolfe’s Fall Reading List</title><link>https://www.faboverfifty.com/book/giveaway-wolfes-reading/#comment-2345087502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;THE SECRET CHORD sounds like a fascinating book and I'd love to win a copy.  David is a complex character and I'd like Brooks' take on him.  (Am adding it to my "must read" list also.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rubio Says His Financial History Is A Good Thing</title><link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/rubio-says-his-financial-history-is-a-good-thing/#comment-2344214884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clearly Rubio was raised by working class people, but that doesn't excuse his misuse of the GOP credit card, the threatened foreclosure on a house or the need to cash in some retirement accounts.  That's just poor financial management.  Then, during the debate, he claimed those were all false accusations.  And that's called lying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GOP campaigns planning to seize debate control from Republican National Committee: report</title><link>http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/gop-campaigns-planning-to-seize-debate-control-from-republican-national-committee-report/comments/#comment-2334524326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think an excellent format for them would be to have fact-checkers instead of moderators.  Each candidate could be given a list of subjects to choose from (gun control; education; climate change; infrastructure rebuilding; job creation; budgeting; etc.) and have 5 minutes to present their views.  Then the fact-checkers would have 2 minutes to respond with corrections to whatever they lied about.  And give them all chairs so they wouldn't get so "tired" standing at a podium for however long.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:14:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ted Cruz BLASTS CNBC Moderators For Being Biased Tools</title><link>http://www.chicksontheright.com/ted-cruz-blasts-cnbc-moderators-for-being-biased-tools/#comment-2333097091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You should try watching the Democratic debates if you want to see how adults behave in a civil manner and discuss actual issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:42:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The NRA Is Promoting An Article Suggesting "Radical" Democrats Will Be Hung After Starting A Civil War Over Gun Rights</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/10/21/the-nra-is-promoting-an-article-suggesting-radi/206318#comment-2319728745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The NRA (and its members) have changed a great deal over the years.   It's interesting to note that most of their money now comes from corporate contributions, grants, royalty income, and advertising - much of that from gun&lt;br&gt; industry sources.  But the gun hoarders and confiscation fearers like to believe that it's still "their" organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Comprehensive Guide To Myths And Facts About Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, and Those Emails</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/10/21/a-comprehensive-guide-to-myths-and-facts-about/206289#comment-2319293646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about some factual data to back up those claims?  If you're referring to her answer during the debate (Asked which enemy she was most proud of making during Tuesday night’s &lt;br&gt;debate, Hillary replied, “Well, in addition to the NRA, the drug &lt;br&gt;companies, the insurance companies, the Iranians, um, probably the &lt;br&gt;Republicans.”), she has stated that her comment was somewhat "tongue in cheek".  Regardless, she didn't say she hated anyone, identify a "worst enemy" or "admit" that she wasn't a uniter.  She has worked across the aisle quite often in her various positions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:32:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foundation Principles | What We Stand For</title><link>http://standfor.containerstore.com/our-foundation-principles#comment-2314012012</link><description>&lt;p&gt;3 Fill the other guy’s basket to the brim. Making money then becomes an easy proposition.® &lt;br&gt;I love this!  It works in every area of life beyond business as well.  Build up and don't tear down.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former RNC Treasurer: &amp;#8216;Take Guns Away From Blacks As They Are The Main Killers&amp;#8217;</title><link>https://forwardprogressives.com/former-rnc-treasurer-randy-pullen-take-guns-away-blacks-main-killers/#comment-2309536035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And according to Justice Department statistics, 84 percent of white people killed every year are killed by other whites.  Ergo, whites are the main killers of whites, so perhaps Randy Pullen thinks guns should be taken away from everyone?  If not, his comment is absolutely racist.  Or does he believe that ONLY #BlackLivesMatter?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox Host Claims Feminism Made Male Democrats Let "Hillary Clinton Win" The Debate</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/10/14/fox-host-claims-feminism-made-male-democrats-le/206124#comment-2307003539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Each of the candidates went over their "allotted time" last night just as the GOP candidates did in their debates.  Clinton was prepared for the questions - that's what intelligent politicians do.  Since you imagine her responses were due to knowing the questions ahead of time, you were clearly impressed at how well she answered.  Last night showed how adults conduct themselves - quite a change from the childish, inarticulate, argumentative behavior exhibited by the GOP hopefuls.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fox Host Claims Feminism Made Male Democrats Let "Hillary Clinton Win" The Debate</title><link>http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/10/14/fox-host-claims-feminism-made-male-democrats-le/206124#comment-2306983497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A friend who watched Fox after the debate said that they were trying to spin Bernie's comment into an attack on Hillary, but I haven't seen it for myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aisling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:58:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>