<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for AchieveMaster</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/AchieveMaster/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/AchieveMaster/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: America is losing the cybersecurity war; China hacked every major US company </title><link>http://blogs.computerworld.com/19951/cybersecurity_america_is_losing_the_war_china_hacked_every_major_us_company#comment-1201834280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with this approach is that Gödel's incompleteness theorem makes it impossible to define a system that knows itself completely - while it would be a very good start, it would not be possible to create a system that is completely secure for this very reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot mic: Obama begs Russians for 'space' on missile defense talks</title><link>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/26/obama-begs-russians-space-missile-defense-talks/#comment-476458251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems both fascinating and quite chilling that Obama thinks he will be elected - as if it were guaranteed.  I think that is the real story here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The NSA Is Building the Country&amp;#8217;s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/#comment-472267016</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wish I could believe what your wrote, but that would require patriots and real Americans working for the NSA.   Insead, they will be staffed with the same sorts of dead-eyed slaves you meet at the DMV when you need to get your license renewed.  Soulless meat-puppets that have no problem destroying your life at the touch of a button.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The NSA Is Building the Country&amp;#8217;s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/#comment-470100436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those who are willing to sacrifice their basic liberties to assure their&lt;br&gt; security deserve neither. -B. Franklin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue here is, do we not only have the right to encrypt our communication, but do we still have the means to do so in light of what these anti-Americans are doing? The answer is, wonderfully, yes.  In fact the answer is given in the article where the NSA states that they can store any encrypted message long enough so that they can perform a brute force decryption of it when they reach so many "Google-Flops" of computing power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But they seemed to forgotten something: Most messages have a expiration date.  After that date, no one cares what the message says.  For example, if I send you an encrypted message to "get the money out of the secret tunnel and send them on the ship to the Cayman Islands" and they figure this out ten years later - it does not matter.  The money is gone!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And that leads to the simple answer to this conundrum of encrypted messaging: Always use a clear-text that essentially "decays with time" so that when the goons at the NSA do figure out your quadruple 1024 DES encrypted message, they won't be able to do anything with it.  Then make sure you make millions of different copies of these messages to essentially create a "DOS" (denial of service) to their Mega-Peta-Flopping servers - they get so bogged down trying to decode 10,000 copies of your grocery list that eventually their system is seen as a huge money sucking failure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And when you have a real message that you do not want them to decode, you utilize a method of message decay that is dependent on real world decay.  You see the problem with the digital world is that there is no entropy.  So everything can be simulated, run backwards, and run over and over - but not so in the real world.  You cannot un-cook and egg or "un-rot" a piece of meat.  If you can link your encrypted text to a real world decay system such that the message is only "viable" for some interval of time and after that it becomes unreadable - then you have performed the digital equivalent of the "Mission Impossible" tape: "This tape will self-destruct in 5 seconds". &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The answer is to feed the beast - with so much crap that it dies from indigestion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-David T. McKee&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;NSA: National enSlavement of America.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:56:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Man Spends Over $350,000 Preparing for End of World</title><link>http://www.geekosystem.com/man-spends-350000-end-of-world/#comment-465927144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And I would like to point out that the entire population of this earth could all be placed into the state of Texas with each person having about 1200 sq ft of space.  This overpopulation thing is just another hash Liberal bullsh*t.  The point is to expand into space, colonize other planets, start sucking the methane out of the gas giants to power ever bigger systems and move out into the universe.  Instead the enviro-wackos want to "hunker down", reduce population (by force if necessary) and "make as little impact as possible".  I want to leave a freaking huge stamp on the galaxy! Tiny little boring liberal minds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Homeschoolers can't be taught 'gay' sex sinful</title><link>http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/homeschoolers-cant-be-taught-gay-sex-sinful/#comment-452458692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wish I lived in Alberta just so I could blatantly break this law!  Homo-Sex is a Sin, is disgusting, and is condemned by God as is all SIN.  Canada is now a cesspool of Liberal illogical idiots.  I hope the parents of Homeschoolers revolt in vast numbers against this disgusting and horrific "law".  Never forget, Rebellion against Tyranny is Obedience to God!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democrats&amp;#8217; cyber bill still looms large</title><link>http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/06/democrats-to-continue-internet-coup-with-new-cyber-bill/#comment-432175191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it is time for those of us who actually do all the work to "Go on strike" as in "Atlas Shrugged" sort of way - and let the liberal mooching scum feed off each other.  We are the ones with the brains, and the ability.  Let those who would make us slaves eat each other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David T. McKee &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Homeland Security Is Monitoring The Drudge Report, The New York Times - Technology - The Atlantic Wire</title><link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2012/01/homeland-security-monitoring-drudge-report-new-york-times/47300/#comment-409821688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your wrong of course... If someone like a George Washington exists and were to fight this system - but as long as those sorts of people with those sorts of convictions, character, and tenacity do not take these scum on, then yes... you are then unfortunately correct in your assessment of the outcome.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caught Spying on Student, FBI Demands GPS Tracker Back</title><link>http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/10/fbi-tracking-device/#comment-226361701</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me find one of those on my car and they will get a baggie full of smashed bits.  A**holes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-David T. MCKee&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sidewiki Blockers</title><link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/#comment-20494064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am working on a rewrite of the Ultimate side-wiki Blocker that uses the htaccess to detect when a site has the side-wiki toolbar installed and only uses the url hash in that case.  This will make the URL even more friendly. Also, a small little post could be popped up optionally to tell the user why SW is being blocked - which could then inform the user about side-wiki and that there are other tool bars they could be using (including the fact that Google is still offering the toolbar without side-wiki).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ultimately the best solution would be to detect side-wiki, and then suck in the content, filter it according to rules set up by the site user, and then display it without the "evil comments".  That gets into a whole other area however - as most users would balk at their content being tampered with.  This is definitely a can-of-worms scenario.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David T. McKee&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: Sorry about the double post before, my browser hiccuped in the middle of posting the original and I thought it did not make it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sidewiki Blockers</title><link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/#comment-20352982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the sidewiki blocker I wrote for both static HTML pages and wordpress as a plugin (you get both) ""The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker".  It has both true randomization of the hash code using the date, true letter and number randomization, and allows you to optionally add a identifier key to the from of your has (no other blocker does this) so you know it is your code running.  The has ends up looking like this:  .../#fortin_8jd754hjdif843hed93h&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, it is absolutely free!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html"&gt;http://www.achievemaster.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;"The Master Achiever"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:57:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Sidewiki Blockers</title><link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/#comment-20352855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to add to your list.  After finding out about the Sidewiki issue on the Warrior Forum, I create "The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker" which incorporates true randomization plus the ability to add a keyword into the hash key so that you know it is your blocker doing the blocking.  No other blocker has this (yet).  I include both a standard script for static pages plus a wordpress plugin and it is all free!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html"&gt;http://www.achievemaster.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;The Master Achiever&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AchieveMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>