<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of 20c</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/20c/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/20c/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 07:15:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Starcom trained its talent to speak programmatic - Digiday</title><link>(u'http://digiday.com/?p=117197',%202008711663L)#comment-2008711663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is nice, warm and fuzzy. Not a real needle mover. Not nearly enough. It is however good press aimed at perception management.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While they may have trained employees to speak programmatic, I wonder if it's like learning a foreign language? Do they have a thick accent? Are they able to use verb conjugation in the past, present and future? How fluent will they become? Can a random employee be dropped into the Paris of programmatic, communicate and survive without missing a beat?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Knowing what a DMP is vs. a DSP is like knowing not to cross the intersection when the light turns red. I just don't see how Starcom is going to truly educate clients on programmatic in a way that leads the client to an enduring competitive advantage. Deep and connected education will come from elsewhere. The best learning for advertisers is hands-on applied learning and the same goes for agencies. Both sides must self-educate separately and together if the goal is to gain a competitive advantage from programmatic prowess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">triscari</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 07:15:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>