Disqus - Latest Comments for 1212H

Re: eMule 0.50a RapCom 1.0 beta

1212H — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:25:35 -0000

{sXMSD} @RAPCOM User Nick protected by ClientAnalyzer [qeqNML] <----- Interesting \^:p , did this user choose that as a nickname, or did his name get hidden by the mod or something.

Re: eMule v0.50a ZZ-R V3.4 Beta 2

1212H — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:18:59 -0000

CA could be a good credit system if some changes were made to the scoring system. For example, i used to have a 1mb upload stream and most people on emule could not match my upload, so their were tons of good uploaders getting reduced scores all cause they could not keep up with my upload, they were good uploaders nevertheless and should have been rewarded and not punished. Also, I used to download much more back then, I mostly only upload now so CA cannot evaluate users based on their upload to me when I'm not downloading anything off them. So what I see is a bunch of people getting their scores reduced for "xs-exploit" wich is b.s. cause I see all kinds of users getting punished for it wether they are using mods or not. I've tested this with official mods and stuff, and I dont know what it takes to "xs-exploit" but any client can get punished for it, mod or not. The xs-exploit punishment would not be too bad if they limited how a person could be punished, but I've seen people getting 0 scores and stuck in my queue for nothing. So to sum it up, punishing people for behaviour is only good for when you are downloading off them enough to have a bit of time to observe the behaviour, if you are not downloading then the only thing CA will punish for is bogus xs-exploit, and aggresive behaviour that it finds in your queue, wich is why CA would make for a great credit system, but in my opinion, insufficient and counterproductive as a antileech system

Re: eMule v0.50a ZZ-R V3.4 Beta 2

1212H — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:56:39 -0000

Is it the default version of antileech.dll that comes with the mod, I just saw a ZZ-R 3.4 using the default modstring and getting punished. Another thing I should have brought up a long time ago is argos in zz-r, althou in 3.4 it is working good overall, I still had to turn off mod-changer and nick-changer detection, every zz-r mod i can remember i've had to turn these off in argos because eventually most mod users will be marked as mod changers, and people using certain official mods will be marked as nick changers no matter how I tweak the change times. I know the problem is not with the detection settings that I set in argos, because when I used apace V1.7 argos would work without flaws, I would still use apace 1.7 if it had multi-server connect. One more thing, since I upgraded to 3.1 or maybe 3.2 of zz-r I have not seen any eplus clients receive upload, and for some strange reason allot of the eplus clients started asking allot faster at first. Anyways, I still cannot upload to them wether upload only to emule is disabled or not.

Re: eMule 0.50a ZZ-R V3.4 Beta 1

1212H — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:13:20 -0000

o, and the non-emule client blocker as well, thanks for the great mods

Re: eMule 0.50a ZZ-R V3.4 Beta 1

1212H — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:03:17 -0000

I hope that this mod will include the option to choose chunks to upload to normal users, as was in the older zz-r mods. Its a nice feature that can help you modify your queue a bit

Re: eMule v0.49c THC

1212H — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:26:00 -0000

Could not get this mod to upload properly, every couple of hours maybe 1 or 2 people got a chunk, no one in my queue, tho in the log I see it sending fakeranks to users (I have not been able to turn off the fakerank either). At first I turned off upload management, then tried with it on today, without success. Could be cause I'm on linux running wine maybe: switching back to zz-r for now. Too bad I like mods with probalistic queue (thou i never managed to accumulate any clients in my queue).

Re: eMule v0.49c THC

1212H — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:40:17 -0000

Looks good, its giving me this issue tho --->RB3 Hack: CRB3Filter::LoadRB3Filter failed - error: Error 12007

Re: eMule-PRO 0.50a Preview

1212H — Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:29:31 -0000

yea, this looks like its just emule with a new splash screen and a new name, emule v0.50a is looking good however, I am looking forward to seeing modders get their hands on it once its released.

Re: eMule 0.49c Apace V1.7 and Apace V1.7 Classic

1212H — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:41:28 -0000

the "bad modstring scheme ban" is causing issues in the apace mod, people with custom modstrings get banned while leecher mods showing random modstrings are not getting punished. Today I went on emule, and I have another friend downloading off me with the apace mod and his modstring is set to the default x-ray 1.7, and he has been punished for it a couple of times